National Heart Lung and Blood Institute
Impact in
-
- Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
- Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
- Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Molecular Biology top 0.5%
- Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
Papers in
-
- Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors 864
- Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies 736
- Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments 569
- Hematology 1.5k
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation 601
- Top scholars
- Earl R. StadtmanToren FinkelDaniel LevyWilliam C. RobertsWarren J. LeonardWilliam B. KannelGeorge A. BraySue Goo Rhee
- Journals
- Journal of Biological Chemistry (1.2k papers)Blood (922 papers)The American Journal of Cardiology (788 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (674 papers)Circulation (668 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
National Heart Lung and Blood Institute
23.3k papers receiving 1.5M citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 248
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 314.5k
- Molecular Biology 519.8k
- Physiology 173.2k
- Cell Biology 114.7k
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 106.1k
Countries citing scholars working at National Heart Lung and Blood Institute
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Heart Lung and Blood Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Heart Lung and Blood Institute more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Heart Lung and Blood Institute
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Heart Lung and Blood Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Heart Lung and Blood Institute at the time of their publication.
About National Heart Lung and Blood Institute
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Heart Lung and Blood Institute have published 26.0k papers, which have received a total of 1.8M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 4.4k papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 1.5k papers in Hematology, 1.3k papers in Genetics, 1.9k papers in Cell Biology and 7.8k papers in Molecular Biology on the topics of Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (864 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (849 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (736 papers), Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (651 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (641 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (601 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (590 papers) and Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (569 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (314.5k citations), Molecular Biology (519.8k citations), Physiology (173.2k citations), Cell Biology (114.7k citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (106.1k citations). Authors at National Heart Lung and Blood Institute collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Biological Chemistry, Blood, The American Journal of Cardiology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Circulation. Some of National Heart Lung and Blood Institute's most productive authors include Earl R. Stadtman, Toren Finkel, Daniel Levy, William C. Roberts, Warren J. Leonard, William B. Kannel, George A. Bray, Sue Goo Rhee, Ramachandran S. Vasan and Emelia J. Benjamin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.