Nanhua University

22.5k citations
944 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Nanhua University

880 papers receiving 22.5k citations

Peers

Nanhua University
Comparison fields: 5 of 230
  • Marketing 1.2k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.3k
  • Information Systems and Management 926
  • Management Science and Operations Research 1.2k
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 450
Replace National Pingtung University with:
National Pingtung University Taiwan
Shu-Te University Taiwan
MingDao University Taiwan
National Quemoy University Taiwan
Shih Chien University Taiwan
Tainan University of Technology Taiwan
Kainan University Taiwan
Aletheia University Taiwan
Wenzhou-Kean University China
National Penghu University of Science and Technology Taiwan
Nanhua University relative to National Pingtung University Taiwan National Pingtung University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
National Pingtung University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Nanhua University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Nanhua University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Nanhua University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nanhua University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Nanhua University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Nanhua University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Nanhua University at the time of their publication.

About Nanhua University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Nanhua University have published 944 papers, which have received a total of 22.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 38 papers in Marketing, 48 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 35 papers in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, 11 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and 23 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation on the topics of Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms (25 papers), VLSI and FPGA Design Techniques (23 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (22 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (20 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (17 papers), Environmental Sustainability in Business (16 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (16 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (14 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Marketing (1.2k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.3k citations), Information Systems and Management (926 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (1.2k citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (450 citations). Authors at Nanhua University collaborate with scholars in Taiwan, China and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Sustainability, Expert Systems with Applications, Pattern Recognition, Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine and International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing. Some of Nanhua University's most productive authors include ching-fu chen, Ming‐Tat Ko, Chung‐Yen Lin, Shu‐Hwa Chen, Ying‐Kai Liao, Chung-Chiang Chen, Song Zan Chiou‐Wei, Ching‐Hsue Cheng, Wann‐Yih Wu and Ming-Chien Hung.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact