National Foundation for Cancer Research

173.1k citations
2.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National Foundation for Cancer Research

1.9k papers receiving 162.3k citations

Peers

National Foundation for Cancer Research
Comparison fields: 5 of 232
  • Immunology and Allergy 27.4k
  • Cell Biology 27.6k
  • Molecular Biology 88.2k
  • Cancer Research 15.8k
  • Hematology 10.5k
Replace American Red Cross with:
American Red Cross United States
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center United States
Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center United States
Ludwig Cancer Research United States
Cancer Research Institute United States
Biogen (United States) United States
Molecular Oncology (United States) United States
Boston Biomedical Research Institute United States
Rutgers Cancer Institute United States
Palmetto Hematology Oncology United States
National Foundation for Cancer Research relative to American Red Cross United States American Red Cross's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
American Red Cross · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Foundation for Cancer Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Foundation for Cancer Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Foundation for Cancer Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Foundation for Cancer Research more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Foundation for Cancer Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Foundation for Cancer Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Foundation for Cancer Research at the time of their publication.

About National Foundation for Cancer Research

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Foundation for Cancer Research have published 2.1k papers, which have received a total of 173.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 214 papers in Immunology and Allergy, 258 papers in Cell Biology, 965 papers in Molecular Biology, 130 papers in Hematology and 153 papers in Cancer Research on the topics of Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (209 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (191 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (106 papers), Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (99 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (78 papers), Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes (71 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (69 papers) and Estrogen and related hormone effects (66 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Immunology and Allergy (27.4k citations), Cell Biology (27.6k citations), Molecular Biology (88.2k citations), Cancer Research (15.8k citations) and Hematology (10.5k citations). Authors at National Foundation for Cancer Research collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Biological Chemistry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Molecular and Cellular Biology, Experimental Cell Research and Cancer. Some of National Foundation for Cancer Research's most productive authors include Erkki Ruoslahti, Michael D. Pierschbacher, Toshiyuki Miyashita, JC Reed, John C. Reed, John C. Reed, D. L. D. Caspar, Eva Engvall, Minoru Fukuda and Magnus Pfahl.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact