National Energy Technology Laboratory

188.0k citations
5.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National Energy Technology Laboratory

4.8k papers receiving 185.7k citations

Peers

National Energy Technology Laboratory
Comparison fields: 5 of 219
  • Catalysis 15.7k
  • Mechanical Engineering 66.9k
  • Environmental Chemistry 16.2k
  • Environmental Engineering 18.2k
  • Materials Chemistry 55.7k
Replace United States Department of Energy with:
United States Department of Energy United States
Ford Motor Company (United States) United States
Dow Chemical (United States) United States
Glenn Research Center United States
Atomic Energy (Canada) Canada
Corning (United States) United States
NIST Center for Neutron Research United States
Parsons (United States) United States
McCormick (United States) United States
Oak Ridge Associated Universities United States
National Energy Technology Laboratory relative to United States Department of Energy United States United States Department of Energy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
United States Department of Energy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Energy Technology Laboratory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Energy Technology Laboratory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Energy Technology Laboratory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Energy Technology Laboratory more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Energy Technology Laboratory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Energy Technology Laboratory at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Energy Technology Laboratory at the time of their publication.

About National Energy Technology Laboratory

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Energy Technology Laboratory have published 5.1k papers, which have received a total of 188.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 392 papers in Catalysis, 1.7k papers in Mechanical Engineering, 624 papers in Ocean Engineering, 532 papers in Environmental Engineering and 1.5k papers in Materials Chemistry on the topics of CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions (425 papers), Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (384 papers), Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (382 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (357 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (348 papers), Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (334 papers), Granular flow and fluidized beds (319 papers) and Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (271 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Catalysis (15.7k citations), Mechanical Engineering (66.9k citations), Environmental Chemistry (16.2k citations), Environmental Engineering (18.2k citations) and Materials Chemistry (55.7k citations). Authors at National Energy Technology Laboratory collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Energy & Fuels, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Powder Technology, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C and International journal of greenhouse gas control. Some of National Energy Technology Laboratory's most productive authors include Michael C. Gao, J. Karl Johnson, Ray Boswell, David S. Sholl, Dan C. Sorescu, Mehrdad Massoudi, Tran X. Phuoc, Ranjani Siriwardane, Peter K. Liaw and Yuhua Duan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact