United States Department of the Interior

3.6k papers receiving 69.1k citations

Peers

United States Department of the Interior
Comparison fields: 5 of 245
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 6.9k
  • Ecology 13.0k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 6.2k
  • Global and Planetary Change 10.5k
  • Geophysics 5.6k
Replace United States Army Corps of Engineers with:
United States Army Corps of Engineers United States
Parsons (United States) United States
United States Bureau of Reclamation United States
National Aeronautics and Space Administration United States
United States Department of Energy United States
Natural Resources Conservation Service United States
Salisbury University United States
Whitney Museum of American Art United States
McCormick (United States) United States
Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory United States
United States Department of the Interior relative to United States Army Corps of Engineers United States United States Army Corps of Engineers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
United States Army Corps of Engineers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at United States Department of the Interior

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United States Department of the Interior. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United States Department of the Interior with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United States Department of the Interior more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at United States Department of the Interior

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United States Department of the Interior at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United States Department of the Interior at the time of their publication.

About United States Department of the Interior

In recent decades, authors affiliated with United States Department of the Interior have published 4.1k papers, which have received a total of 72.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 30 papers in Fuel Technology, 210 papers in Geochemistry and Petrology, 383 papers in Water Science and Technology, 119 papers in Geology and 242 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation on the topics of Water Quality and Resources Studies (214 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (171 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (132 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (131 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (129 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (128 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (110 papers) and Groundwater flow and contamination studies (107 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (6.9k citations), Ecology (13.0k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (6.2k citations), Global and Planetary Change (10.5k citations) and Geophysics (5.6k citations). Authors at United States Department of the Interior collaborate with scholars in United States, Brazil and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, JOM, Science, American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal and The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics. Some of United States Department of the Interior's most productive authors include Gary Wedemeyer, Tony L. Wahl, D. W. Scott, Robert G. Coleman, Kenneth L. Cashdollar, W.F. Tinney, C. Mervin Palmer, Donald I. Mount, B. T. Brady and N. A. Gokcen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact