Point Blue Conservation Science
Impact in
- Ecology top 5%
- Avian ecology and behavior
- Marine animal studies overview
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Polar Research and Ecology
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
Papers in
- Ecology 533
- Avian ecology and behavior 420
- Marine animal studies overview 151
- Polar Research and Ecology 21
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 17
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 32
- Top scholars
- David G. AinleyWilliam J. SydemanNadav NurJohn A. WiensGrant BallardPeter PyleGary W. PageThomas Gardali
- Journals
- Ornithological Applications (76 papers)The Auk (37 papers)PLoS ONE (24 papers)Marine Ecology Progress Series (24 papers)San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science (18 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNew ZealandCanada
In The Last Decade
Point Blue Conservation Science
691 papers receiving 26.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 182
- Ecology 16.5k
- Ecological Modeling 1.8k
- Global and Planetary Change 4.3k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.1k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2.1k
Countries citing scholars working at Point Blue Conservation Science
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Point Blue Conservation Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Point Blue Conservation Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Point Blue Conservation Science more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Point Blue Conservation Science
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Point Blue Conservation Science at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Point Blue Conservation Science at the time of their publication.
About Point Blue Conservation Science
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Point Blue Conservation Science have published 706 papers, which have received a total of 26.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 533 papers in Ecology, 32 papers in Ecological Modeling, 112 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 7 papers in Developmental Biology and 33 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation on the topics of Avian ecology and behavior (420 papers), Marine animal studies overview (151 papers), Marine and fisheries research (70 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (43 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (32 papers), Polar Research and Ecology (21 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (18 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (17 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecology (16.5k citations), Ecological Modeling (1.8k citations), Global and Planetary Change (4.3k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.1k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (2.1k citations). Authors at Point Blue Conservation Science collaborate with scholars in United States, New Zealand and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Ornithological Applications, The Auk, PLoS ONE, Marine Ecology Progress Series and San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science. Some of Point Blue Conservation Science's most productive authors include David G. Ainley, William J. Sydeman, Nadav Nur, John A. Wiens, Grant Ballard, Peter Pyle, Gary W. Page, Thomas Gardali, Nathaniel E. Seavy and Dennis Jongsomjit.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.