National Agricultural Statistics Service

13.5k citations
523 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National Agricultural Statistics Service

463 papers receiving 12.8k citations

Peers

National Agricultural Statistics Service
Comparison fields: 5 of 210
  • Ecology 5.2k
  • Environmental Engineering 2.8k
  • Global and Planetary Change 3.9k
  • Media Technology 879
  • Atmospheric Science 1.7k
Replace National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center with:
National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center United States
Earth Resources Technology (United States) United States
National Geographic Society United States
Foreign Agricultural Service United States
Virginia Institute of Marine Science United States
Institute of the Environment United States
National Wildlife Federation United States
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality United States
Chesapeake Bay Program United States
ForestGEO United States
National Agricultural Statistics Service relative to National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center United States National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Agricultural Statistics Service

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Agricultural Statistics Service. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Agricultural Statistics Service with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Agricultural Statistics Service more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Agricultural Statistics Service

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Agricultural Statistics Service at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Agricultural Statistics Service at the time of their publication.

About National Agricultural Statistics Service

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Agricultural Statistics Service have published 523 papers, which have received a total of 13.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 75 papers in Environmental Engineering, 179 papers in Plant Science, 117 papers in Ecology, 45 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science and 35 papers in Statistics and Probability on the topics of Remote Sensing in Agriculture (88 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (47 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (35 papers), Plant Pathogens and Resistance (34 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (33 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (26 papers), Soil Geostatistics and Mapping (25 papers) and Climate change impacts on agriculture (24 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecology (5.2k citations), Environmental Engineering (2.8k citations), Global and Planetary Change (3.9k citations), Media Technology (879 citations) and Atmospheric Science (1.7k citations). Authors at National Agricultural Statistics Service collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and China and have published in prestigious journals including Plant Pathology, Annals of Applied Biology, Remote Sensing of Environment, Remote Sensing and Nature. Some of National Agricultural Statistics Service's most productive authors include David M. Johnson, Zhengwei Yang, Rick Mueller, Claire G. Boryan, Phillip S. Kott, Daniel A. Griffith, Martha C. Anderson, Liping Di, Richard Mueller and Feng Gao.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact