Manchester Royal Infirmary

323.9k citations
9.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Dialysis and Renal Disease Management 187
    • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments 135

Manchester Royal Infirmary

7.9k papers receiving 276.8k citations

Peers

Manchester Royal Infirmary
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
  • Nephrology 15.2k
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 34.3k
  • Hematology 19.3k
  • Rehabilitation 10.5k
  • Transplantation 4.1k
Replace St George's, University of London with:
St George's, University of London United Kingdom
St Thomas' Hospital United Kingdom
Royal London Hospital United Kingdom
Edinburgh Royal Infirmary United Kingdom
St George's Hospital United Kingdom
St Bartholomew's Hospital United Kingdom
National Health Service United Kingdom
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust United Kingdom
Southampton General Hospital United Kingdom
Great Ormond Street Hospital United Kingdom
Manchester Royal Infirmary relative to St George's, University of London United Kingdom St George's, University of London's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
St George's, University of London · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Manchester Royal Infirmary

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Manchester Royal Infirmary. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Manchester Royal Infirmary with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Manchester Royal Infirmary more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Manchester Royal Infirmary

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Manchester Royal Infirmary at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Manchester Royal Infirmary at the time of their publication.

About Manchester Royal Infirmary

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Manchester Royal Infirmary have published 9.1k papers, which have received a total of 323.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 456 papers in Nephrology, 139 papers in Transplantation, 537 papers in Hematology, 2.0k papers in Surgery and 227 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine on the topics of Bacterial Infections and Vaccines (229 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (228 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (200 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (198 papers), Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (187 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (184 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (135 papers) and Platelet Disorders and Treatments (128 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nephrology (15.2k citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (34.3k citations), Hematology (19.3k citations), Rehabilitation (10.5k citations) and Transplantation (4.1k citations). Authors at Manchester Royal Infirmary collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including Emergency Medicine Journal, The Lancet, British journal of surgery, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology and British Journal of Haematology. Some of Manchester Royal Infirmary's most productive authors include Andrew J.M. Boulton, Paul N. Durrington, Julie S. Snowden, R Baldwin, Rayaz A. Malik, Michael I. Mackness, David Neary, Ram Gokal, David G. Armstrong and Francis Creed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact