National Health Service

640.4k citations
14.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation 143
    • Blood groups and transfusion 113
    • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology 124
    • Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders 123

National Health Service

13.6k papers receiving 640.2k citations

Peers

National Health Service
Comparison fields: 5 of 246
  • Biological Psychiatry 2.7k
  • Genetics 16.1k
  • Hematology 24.2k
  • Oncology 39.6k
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 48.9k
Replace St George's, University of London with:
St George's, University of London United Kingdom
King's College Hospital United Kingdom
The Royal Free Hospital United Kingdom
National Institute for Health and Care Research United Kingdom
St Bartholomew's Hospital United Kingdom
St Mary's Hospital United Kingdom
Ghent University Hospital Belgium
Amsterdam University Medical Centers Netherlands
Queen's Medical Centre United Kingdom
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille France
National Health Service relative to St George's, University of London United Kingdom St George's, University of London's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
St George's, University of London · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Health Service

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Health Service. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Health Service with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Health Service more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Health Service

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Health Service at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Health Service at the time of their publication.

About National Health Service

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Health Service have published 14.4k papers, which have received a total of 640.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 562 papers in Hematology, 348 papers in Genetics, 687 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 635 papers in Infectious Diseases and 1k papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine on the topics of Schizophrenia research and treatment (267 papers), Blood transfusion and management (181 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (143 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (125 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (124 papers), Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (123 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (119 papers) and Blood groups and transfusion (113 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biological Psychiatry (2.7k citations), Genetics (16.1k citations), Hematology (24.2k citations), Oncology (39.6k citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (48.9k citations). Authors at National Health Service collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including Blood, PLoS ONE, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Journal of Clinical Oncology and The Lancet. Some of National Health Service's most productive authors include Brendon Stubbs, Davy Vancampfort, Andrea Danese, Paolo Fusar‐Poli, Nicola Veronese, Marco Solmi, Elizabeth Catherine Smyth, Florian Lordick, Simon Rosenbaum and Heike Irmgard Grabsch.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact