MIT Art, Design and Technology University

1.4k papers receiving 12.1k citations

Peers

MIT Art, Design and Technology University
Comparison fields: 5 of 225
  • Automotive Engineering 806
  • Health Information Management 285
  • Information Systems 1.5k
  • Health Informatics 90
  • Artificial Intelligence 1.9k
Replace COEP Technological University with:
COEP Technological University India
Charotar University of Science and Technology India
Aditya Birla (India) India
Defence Institute of Advanced Technology India
KLE Technological University India
Visvesvaraya Technological University India
Parul University India
Vishwakarma Institute of Technology India
Centre for Development of Advanced Computing India
Sandip Foundation India
MIT Art, Design and Technology University relative to COEP Technological University India COEP Technological University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
COEP Technological University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at MIT Art, Design and Technology University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at MIT Art, Design and Technology University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at MIT Art, Design and Technology University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites MIT Art, Design and Technology University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at MIT Art, Design and Technology University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with MIT Art, Design and Technology University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with MIT Art, Design and Technology University at the time of their publication.

About MIT Art, Design and Technology University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with MIT Art, Design and Technology University have published 1.9k papers, which have received a total of 13.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 48 papers in Health Information Management, 234 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 211 papers in Information Systems, 12 papers in Health Informatics and 284 papers in Artificial Intelligence on the topics of Smart Agriculture and AI (56 papers), IoT and Edge/Fog Computing (55 papers), IoT-based Smart Home Systems (54 papers), Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (54 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare (47 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (43 papers), Heat Transfer and Optimization (43 papers) and Advanced machining processes and optimization (34 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Automotive Engineering (806 citations), Health Information Management (285 citations), Information Systems (1.5k citations), Health Informatics (90 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (1.9k citations). Authors at MIT Art, Design and Technology University collaborate with scholars in India, United States and Saudi Arabia and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, Multimedia Tools and Applications, IEEE Access, International Journal of Ambient Energy and Scientific Reports. Some of MIT Art, Design and Technology University's most productive authors include B. K. Patle, Virendra Talele, Sunita Barve, Ramgopal Kashyap, Jameer Gulab Kotwal, Renu Vyas, Kiran Bharat Lokhande, Yogesh Chandra Sharma, Chih‐Huang Weng and S. N. Kaul.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact