Parul University

2.4k papers receiving 20.3k citations

Peers

Parul University
Comparison fields: 5 of 238
  • Pharmaceutical Science 876
  • Health Informatics 206
  • Biomaterials 923
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 518
  • Health Information Management 273
Replace Gujarat Technological University with:
Gujarat Technological University India
Ahmedabad University India
Charotar University of Science and Technology India
B.J. Medical College India
Rajiv Gandhi Technical University India
Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur India
Tata Consultancy Services (India) India
Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya India
Barkatullah University India
Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre India
Parul University relative to Gujarat Technological University India Gujarat Technological University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Gujarat Technological University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Parul University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Parul University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Parul University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Parul University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Parul University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Parul University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Parul University at the time of their publication.

About Parul University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Parul University have published 3.2k papers, which have received a total of 23.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 98 papers in Pharmaceutical Science, 105 papers in Complementary and alternative medicine, 54 papers in Health Information Management, 226 papers in Information Systems and 223 papers in Computer Networks and Communications on the topics of IoT and Edge/Fog Computing (77 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (72 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (65 papers), Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (64 papers), Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (58 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (50 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (48 papers) and Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (44 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Pharmaceutical Science (876 citations), Health Informatics (206 citations), Biomaterials (923 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (518 citations) and Health Information Management (273 citations). Authors at Parul University collaborate with scholars in India, Saudi Arabia and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Scientific Reports, IEEE Access, Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, Sustainability and Environmental Science and Pollution Research. Some of Parul University's most productive authors include Archana Mohit Navale, Tarun Kumar Upadhyay, Archana N. Paranjape, Rajesh Kesarla, Abdelwahab Omri, Sharnil Pandya, Shweta Kirti Gupta, Mohd Adnan, Prince Jain and Vishal P Sorathiya.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact