The University of Melbourne

6.9M citations
207.8k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

The University of Melbourne

181.2k papers receiving 6.1M citations

Peers

The University of Melbourne
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 233.9k
  • Biological Psychiatry 36.7k
  • Immunology 305.2k
  • Ecological Modeling 66.1k
  • Molecular Biology 929.7k
Replace Monash University with:
Monash University Australia
The University of Sydney Australia
UNSW Sydney Australia
Australian National University Australia
The University of Adelaide Australia
Deakin University Australia
La Trobe University Australia
The University of Queensland Australia
Macquarie University Australia
Flinders University Australia
The University of Melbourne relative to Monash University Australia Monash University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Monash University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at The University of Melbourne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at The University of Melbourne. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at The University of Melbourne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The University of Melbourne more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at The University of Melbourne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with The University of Melbourne at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with The University of Melbourne at the time of their publication.

About The University of Melbourne

In recent decades, authors affiliated with The University of Melbourne have published 207.8k papers, which have received a total of 6.9M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 5.9k papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 7.4k papers in Clinical Psychology, 8.9k papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 10.5k papers in Epidemiology and 6.3k papers in Cognitive Neuroscience on the topics of Immune Cell Function and Interaction (2.0k papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (1.6k papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (1.4k papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (1.4k papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1.4k papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1.4k papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (1.4k papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (1.3k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Psychiatry and Mental health (233.9k citations), Biological Psychiatry (36.7k citations), Immunology (305.2k citations), Ecological Modeling (66.1k citations) and Molecular Biology (929.7k citations). Authors at The University of Melbourne collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, The Medical Journal of Australia, Scientific Reports, BMJ Open and Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. Some of The University of Melbourne's most productive authors include Rajkumar Buyya, Gordon K. Smyth, Paul Mulvaney, Wei Shi, Roger Powell, J.S.J. van Deventer, Ashley I. Bush, Jane Elith, Frank Caruso and Ary A. Hoffmann.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact