University of Saskatchewan

1.9M citations
68.6k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

University of Saskatchewan

61.7k papers receiving 1.8M citations

Peers

University of Saskatchewan
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 65.3k
  • Animal Science and Zoology 52.7k
  • Environmental Chemistry 49.4k
  • Soil Science 45.8k
  • Equine 7.1k
Replace University of Alberta with:
University of Alberta Canada
University of Calgary Canada
University of Manitoba Canada
Montana State University United States
Washington State University United States
Colorado State University United States
University of Wyoming United States
Utah State University United States
University of Idaho United States
University of Colorado Boulder United States
University of Saskatchewan relative to University of Alberta Canada University of Alberta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
University of Alberta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Saskatchewan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Saskatchewan. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Saskatchewan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Saskatchewan more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Saskatchewan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Saskatchewan at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Saskatchewan at the time of their publication.

About University of Saskatchewan

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Saskatchewan have published 68.6k papers, which have received a total of 1.9M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.6k papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 400 papers in Equine, 1.4k papers in Small Animals, 1.7k papers in Animal Science and Zoology and 1.5k papers in Environmental Chemistry on the topics of Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (1.0k papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (873 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (866 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (806 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (782 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (755 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (736 papers) and Power System Reliability and Maintenance (695 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Agronomy and Crop Science (65.3k citations), Animal Science and Zoology (52.7k citations), Environmental Chemistry (49.4k citations), Soil Science (45.8k citations) and Equine (7.1k citations). Authors at University of Saskatchewan collaborate with scholars in Canada, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports, Canadian Journal of Animal Science, Journal of Animal Science and Theriogenology. Some of University of Saskatchewan's most productive authors include R. Billinton, Ajay K. Dalai, John P. Giesy, Rui Wang, Leif Hertz, Paul G. Mezey, Douglas P. Chivers, Carl Gutwin, Kailash Prasad and Keith A. Hobson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact