University of Lisbon

2.3M citations
97.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

University of Lisbon

86.6k papers receiving 2.1M citations

Peers

University of Lisbon
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Global and Planetary Change 159.5k
  • Building and Construction 80.2k
  • Ecology 131.8k
  • Earth-Surface Processes 34.7k
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 68.1k
Replace Universidade do Porto with:
Universidade do Porto Portugal
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Spain
University of Coimbra Portugal
Universidad de Granada Spain
University of Aveiro Portugal
Universidad Complutense de Madrid Spain
Universidad de Sevilla Spain
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela Spain
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Spain
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Spain
University of Lisbon relative to Universidade do Porto Portugal Universidade do Porto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.2×
Universidade do Porto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Lisbon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Lisbon. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Lisbon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Lisbon more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Lisbon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Lisbon at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Lisbon at the time of their publication.

About University of Lisbon

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Lisbon have published 97.3k papers, which have received a total of 2.3M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 4.9k papers in Global and Planetary Change, 1.6k papers in Earth-Surface Processes, 2.9k papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 2.6k papers in Building and Construction and 4.6k papers in Ecology on the topics of Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (1.1k papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (929 papers), Climate variability and models (835 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (816 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (806 papers), Marine and fisheries research (763 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (763 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (741 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Global and Planetary Change (159.5k citations), Building and Construction (80.2k citations), Ecology (131.8k citations), Earth-Surface Processes (34.7k citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (68.1k citations). Authors at University of Lisbon collaborate with scholars in Portugal, Spain and United States and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports, Physical review. D, Sustainability and Ocean Engineering. Some of University of Lisbon's most productive authors include Carlos Guedes Soares, Jorge de Brito, Carlos Pestana Barros, Francisco S. N. Lobo, M. M. Chaves, José M. Bioucas‐Dias, Ricardo Machado Trigo, Luis Santos Pereira, Armando J. L. Pombeiro and António F.O. Falcão.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact