McNeil Center for Early American Studies
Impact in
-
- Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
-
- Market Dynamics and Volatility
- Economic theories and models
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Papers in
-
- Anesthesia and Sedative Agents 11
-
- Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare 16
- Top scholars
- Jesús Fernández‐VillaverdeJere R. BehrmanAna Cecília FielerJuan Francisco Rubio-Ramı́rezEugenio J. MiraveteGene F. TutwilerGeorges ReniersJoseph F. Gardocki
- Journals
- Anesthesia & Analgesia (10 papers)Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (9 papers)American Economic Review (9 papers)Journal of Chromatography A (8 papers)Sociological Forum (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
McNeil Center for Early American Studies
324 papers receiving 10.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 231
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 947
- Economics and Econometrics 2.0k
- Safety Research 531
- Finance 595
- Accounting 595
Countries citing scholars working at McNeil Center for Early American Studies
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at McNeil Center for Early American Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at McNeil Center for Early American Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites McNeil Center for Early American Studies more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at McNeil Center for Early American Studies
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with McNeil Center for Early American Studies at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with McNeil Center for Early American Studies at the time of their publication.
About McNeil Center for Early American Studies
In recent decades, authors affiliated with McNeil Center for Early American Studies have published 377 papers, which have received a total of 11.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 13 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 21 papers in Safety Research, 17 papers in Pharmacology, 50 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 15 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance on the topics of Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (16 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (12 papers), Economic theories and models (12 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (12 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (11 papers), Global Health Care Issues (11 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (10 papers) and Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (10 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (947 citations), Economics and Econometrics (2.0k citations), Safety Research (531 citations), Finance (595 citations) and Accounting (595 citations). Authors at McNeil Center for Early American Studies collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Anesthesia & Analgesia, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, American Economic Review, Journal of Chromatography A and Sociological Forum. Some of McNeil Center for Early American Studies's most productive authors include Jesús Fernández‐Villaverde, Jere R. Behrman, Ana Cecília Fieler, Juan Francisco Rubio-Ramı́rez, Eugenio J. Miravete, Gene F. Tutwiler, Georges Reniers, Joseph F. Gardocki, Hans‐Peter Kohler and Pablo Guerrón-Quintana.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.