Institute for New Economic Thinking
Impact in
- General Decision Sciences top 10%
-
- Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
- Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Housing Market and Economics
- Market Dynamics and Volatility
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Papers in
-
- Economic Theory and Policy 27
- Monetary Policy and Economic Impact 26
-
- Economic theories and models 21
- Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis 20
- Climate Change Policy and Economics 17
- Top scholars
- Richard PaulJonathan BaronDeborah FrischDavid VinesJoseph E. StiglitzJohn N. J. MuellbauerJ. Doyne FarmerRyan Rafaty
- Journals
- Oxford Review of Economic Policy (16 papers)Review of Income and Wealth (7 papers)International Journal of Political Economy (6 papers)Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics (4 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Institute for New Economic Thinking
226 papers receiving 4.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 184
- General Decision Sciences 174
- Economics and Econometrics 1.8k
- Finance 579
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 460
- Safety Research 445
Countries citing scholars working at Institute for New Economic Thinking
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute for New Economic Thinking. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute for New Economic Thinking with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute for New Economic Thinking more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Institute for New Economic Thinking
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute for New Economic Thinking at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute for New Economic Thinking at the time of their publication.
About Institute for New Economic Thinking
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute for New Economic Thinking have published 290 papers, which have received a total of 4.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 49 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 111 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 32 papers in Finance, 4 papers in General Decision Sciences and 23 papers in Management Science and Operations Research on the topics of Economic Theory and Policy (27 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (26 papers), Economic theories and models (21 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (20 papers), Climate Change Policy and Economics (17 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (13 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (13 papers) and Income, Poverty, and Inequality (13 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Decision Sciences (174 citations), Economics and Econometrics (1.8k citations), Finance (579 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (460 citations) and Safety Research (445 citations). Authors at Institute for New Economic Thinking collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Review of Income and Wealth, International Journal of Political Economy, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Some of Institute for New Economic Thinking's most productive authors include Richard Paul, Jonathan Baron, Deborah Frisch, David Vines, Joseph E. Stiglitz, John N. J. Muellbauer, J. Doyne Farmer, Ryan Rafaty, Alexander Teytelboym and Linda Elder.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.