Materials Processing (United States)

110.0k citations
3.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Materials Processing (United States)

2.9k papers receiving 108.0k citations

Peers

Materials Processing (United States)
Comparison fields: 5 of 224
  • Materials Chemistry 51.2k
  • Polymers and Plastics 11.4k
  • Ceramics and Composites 4.4k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 13.1k
  • Mechanical Engineering 24.6k
Replace Fluor (United States) with:
Fluor (United States) United States
Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados Mexico
Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies United States
Nanomaterials Research (United States) United States
Material Sciences (United States) United States
Interface (United States) United States
Mexican Institute of Petroleum Mexico
Dow Chemical (United States) United States
Gas Technology Institute United States
Material Measurement Laboratory United States
Materials Processing (United States) relative to Fluor (United States) United States Fluor (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Fluor (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Materials Processing (United States)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Materials Processing (United States). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Materials Processing (United States) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Materials Processing (United States) more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Materials Processing (United States)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Materials Processing (United States) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Materials Processing (United States) at the time of their publication.

About Materials Processing (United States)

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Materials Processing (United States) have published 3.1k papers, which have received a total of 110.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 181 papers in Ceramics and Composites, 1.4k papers in Materials Chemistry, 935 papers in Mechanical Engineering, 274 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and 364 papers in Mechanics of Materials on the topics of Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (152 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (149 papers), Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics (147 papers), Advanced ceramic materials synthesis (146 papers), Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties (133 papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (132 papers), Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties (123 papers) and Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (122 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Materials Chemistry (51.2k citations), Polymers and Plastics (11.4k citations), Ceramics and Composites (4.4k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (13.1k citations) and Mechanical Engineering (24.6k citations). Authors at Materials Processing (United States) collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Japan and have published in prestigious journals including ISIJ International, RSC Advances, Journal of Materials Chemistry A, Tetsu-to-Hagane and Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. Some of Materials Processing (United States)'s most productive authors include Sudipta Seal, Bruce H. Weiller, Richard B. Kaner, William T. Self, Egon Matijević, Swanand Patil, Ajay Karakoti, Shabnam Virji, Matthew S. Dargusch and S. V. Babu.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact