Dow Chemical (United States)

277.6k citations
8.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Dow Chemical (United States)

7.6k papers receiving 267.8k citations

Peers

Dow Chemical (United States)
Comparison fields: 5 of 248
  • Polymers and Plastics 47.1k
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 7.1k
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 26.6k
  • Chemical Health and Safety 1.2k
  • Organic Chemistry 48.6k
Replace Procter & Gamble (United States) with:
Procter & Gamble (United States) United States
DuPont (United States) United States
Monsanto (United States) United States
United States Department of Energy United States
Wilmington University United States
Corning (United States) United States
BASF (United States) United States
Oak Ridge Associated Universities United States
Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique Canada
Division of Chemistry United States
Dow Chemical (United States) relative to Procter & Gamble (United States) United States Procter & Gamble (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.0×
Procter & Gamble (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Dow Chemical (United States)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Dow Chemical (United States). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Dow Chemical (United States) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dow Chemical (United States) more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Dow Chemical (United States)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Dow Chemical (United States) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Dow Chemical (United States) at the time of their publication.

About Dow Chemical (United States)

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Dow Chemical (United States) have published 8.2k papers, which have received a total of 277.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 85 papers in Chemical Health and Safety, 1.3k papers in Polymers and Plastics, 191 papers in Process Chemistry and Technology, 725 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and 1.3k papers in Organic Chemistry on the topics of Polymer crystallization and properties (600 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (477 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (423 papers), Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties (364 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (353 papers), Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (341 papers), Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (273 papers) and Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (216 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Polymers and Plastics (47.1k citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (7.1k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (26.6k citations), Chemical Health and Safety (1.2k citations) and Organic Chemistry (48.6k citations). Authors at Dow Chemical (United States) collaborate with scholars in United States, India and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Macromolecules, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Toxicological Sciences and Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. Some of Dow Chemical (United States)'s most productive authors include George L. Ellman, Richard A. Nyquist, Raymond F. Boyer, Donald A. Tomalia, M. Inbasekaran, E. P. Woo, L. H. Tung, William A. Goddard, Adel M. Naylor and J. C. Evans.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact