Material Sciences (United States)

121.5k citations
3.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Material Sciences (United States)

2.9k papers receiving 116.5k citations

Peers

Material Sciences (United States)
Comparison fields: 5 of 232
  • Materials Chemistry 43.3k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 16.8k
  • Inorganic Chemistry 8.7k
  • Orthodontics 2.3k
  • Biomedical Engineering 24.4k
Replace Corning (United States) with:
Corning (United States) United States
Material Measurement Laboratory United States
Carestream (United States) United States
Kodak (United States) United States
Division of Chemistry United States
Center for Nanoscale Science and Technology United States
Minneapolis Institute of Arts United States
Materials Processing (United States) United States
United States Army Combat Capabilities Development Command United States
Industrial Research Institute United States
Material Sciences (United States) relative to Corning (United States) United States Corning (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Corning (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Material Sciences (United States)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Material Sciences (United States). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Material Sciences (United States) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Material Sciences (United States) more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Material Sciences (United States)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Material Sciences (United States) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Material Sciences (United States) at the time of their publication.

About Material Sciences (United States)

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Material Sciences (United States) have published 3.1k papers, which have received a total of 121.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 986 papers in Materials Chemistry, 220 papers in Inorganic Chemistry, 266 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, 83 papers in Ceramics and Composites and 407 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics on the topics of Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (120 papers), Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (109 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (92 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (90 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (81 papers), Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films (78 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (70 papers) and Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (69 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Materials Chemistry (43.3k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (16.8k citations), Inorganic Chemistry (8.7k citations), Orthodontics (2.3k citations) and Biomedical Engineering (24.4k citations). Authors at Material Sciences (United States) collaborate with scholars in United States, Japan and China and have published in prestigious journals including RSC Advances, Chemistry Letters, Chemical Communications, Journal of Applied Physics and Applied Physics Letters. Some of Material Sciences (United States)'s most productive authors include Xiang Zhang, Philip L. Walker Jr., Chandra Sekhar Rout, Guy Bartal, A. Paul Alivisatos, Steven G. Louie, Xiaobo Yin, Thomas Zentgraf, F. F. Lange and K Namsheer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact