Material Sciences (United States)

122.4k citations
3.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Material Sciences (United States)

3.0k papers receiving 118.6k citations

Peers

Material Sciences (United States)
Comparison fields: 5 of 239
  • Materials Chemistry 43.4k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 16.8k
  • Inorganic Chemistry 8.6k
  • Orthodontics 2.4k
  • Biomedical Engineering 24.1k
Replace Wright-Patterson Air Force Base with:
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base United States
Dow Chemical (United States) United States
3M (United States) United States
Procter & Gamble (United States) United States
Corning (United States) United States
Material Measurement Laboratory United States
Interface (United States) United States
Carestream (United States) United States
Kodak (United States) United States
Ames National Laboratory United States
Material Sciences (United States) relative to Wright-Patterson Air Force Base United States Wright-Patterson Air Force Base's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Material Sciences (United States)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Material Sciences (United States). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Material Sciences (United States) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Material Sciences (United States) more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Material Sciences (United States)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Material Sciences (United States) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Material Sciences (United States) at the time of their publication.

About Material Sciences (United States)

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Material Sciences (United States) have published 3.2k papers, which have received a total of 122.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.0k papers in Materials Chemistry, 231 papers in Inorganic Chemistry, 280 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, 84 papers in Ceramics and Composites and 51 papers in Orthodontics on the topics of Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (129 papers), Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (115 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (94 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (93 papers), Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films (82 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (82 papers), Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques (75 papers) and Conducting polymers and applications (71 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Materials Chemistry (43.4k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (16.8k citations), Inorganic Chemistry (8.6k citations), Orthodontics (2.4k citations) and Biomedical Engineering (24.1k citations). Authors at Material Sciences (United States) collaborate with scholars in United States, Japan and China and have published in prestigious journals including RSC Advances, Chemistry Letters, Chemical Communications, Journal of Applied Physics and Journal of Materials Chemistry A. Some of Material Sciences (United States)'s most productive authors include Xiang Zhang, P.L. Walker, Chandra Sekhar Rout, A. Paul Alivisatos, Guy Bartal, Thomas Zentgraf, Steven G. Louie, F. F. Lange, K Namsheer and Susumu Kitagawa.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact