Loyola University Chicago

957.9k citations
30.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Loyola University Chicago

28.5k papers receiving 957k citations

Peers

Loyola University Chicago
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 61.1k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 5.9k
  • Sensory Systems 10.3k
  • Infectious Diseases 35.1k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 24.9k
Replace Indiana University Indianapolis with:
Indiana University Indianapolis United States
Purdue University West Lafayette United States
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis United States
Indiana University United States
University of Louisville United States
Saint Louis University United States
Michigan State University United States
University of Illinois Chicago United States
University of Missouri United States
Indiana University Bloomington United States
Loyola University Chicago relative to Indiana University Indianapolis United States Indiana University Indianapolis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Indiana University Indianapolis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Loyola University Chicago

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Loyola University Chicago. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Loyola University Chicago with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Loyola University Chicago more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Loyola University Chicago

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Loyola University Chicago at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Loyola University Chicago at the time of their publication.

About Loyola University Chicago

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Loyola University Chicago have published 30.4k papers, which have received a total of 957.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.5k papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 1.7k papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 258 papers in Sensory Systems, 733 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 130 papers in Behavioral Neuroscience on the topics of Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (495 papers), Ethics and bioethics in healthcare (319 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (244 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (244 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (235 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (229 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (223 papers) and Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (208 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (61.1k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (5.9k citations), Sensory Systems (10.3k citations), Infectious Diseases (35.1k citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (24.9k citations). Authors at Loyola University Chicago collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Biological Chemistry, PLoS ONE, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Blood and Brain Research. Some of Loyola University Chicago's most productive authors include Donald M. Bers, Joseph A. Durlak, Grayson N. Holmbeck, Steven D. Brown, Robert W. Lent, Richard R. Fay, Richard Cooper, Martin J. Tobin, Fred B. Bryant and Alan J. Wolfe.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact