Loyola University Chicago

844.8k citations
28.9k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Loyola University Chicago

24.4k papers receiving 743.3k citations

Peers

Loyola University Chicago
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 10.8k
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 52.5k
  • Clinical Psychology 52.4k
  • Developmental Biology 5.7k
  • Social Psychology 53.9k
Replace University of Louisville with:
University of Louisville United States
University of Cincinnati United States
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee United States
Saint Louis University United States
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis United States
Wayne State University United States
Indiana University Bloomington United States
University of Notre Dame United States
University of Illinois Chicago United States
Indiana University United States
Loyola University Chicago relative to University of Louisville United States University of Louisville's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
University of Louisville · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Loyola University Chicago

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Loyola University Chicago. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Loyola University Chicago with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Loyola University Chicago more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Loyola University Chicago

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Loyola University Chicago at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Loyola University Chicago at the time of their publication.

About Loyola University Chicago

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Loyola University Chicago have published 28.9k papers, which have received a total of 844.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.6k papers in Clinical Psychology, 1.5k papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 247 papers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 1.4k papers in Social Psychology and 1.2k papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience on the topics of Ion channel regulation and function (542 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (478 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (431 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (410 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (280 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (271 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (247 papers) and Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (243 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Behavioral Neuroscience (10.8k citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (52.5k citations), Clinical Psychology (52.4k citations), Developmental Biology (5.7k citations) and Social Psychology (53.9k citations). Authors at Loyola University Chicago collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Journal of Biological Chemistry, PLoS ONE, Blood and International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. Some of Loyola University Chicago's most productive authors include Donald M. Bers, Joseph A. Durlak, Grayson N. Holmbeck, Steven D. Brown, Richard R. Fay, Robert W. Lent, Fred B. Bryant, Alan J. Wolfe, Terri Pigott and Arthur N. Popper.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact