Los Alamos National Laboratory
Impact in
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 0.05%
- Nuclear physics research studies
- Condensed Matter Physics top 0.05%
- Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
- Rare-earth and actinide compounds
Papers in
-
- Nuclear physics research studies 3.1k
- Radiation 5.9k
- Nuclear Physics and Applications 4.4k
- Top scholars
- P. Jeffrey HayWillard R. WadtAlan S. PerelsonVictor I. KlimovThomas C. TerwilligerC.W. HirtWojciech H. ZurekGeoffrey B. West
- Journals
- Physical Review Letters (2.5k papers)Physical review. B, Condensed matter (1.4k papers)The Journal of Chemical Physics (1.3k papers)Journal of Applied Physics (1.2k papers)Physical Review B (1.1k papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Los Alamos National Laboratory
74.6k papers receiving 3.0M citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 250
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 285.9k
- Condensed Matter Physics 235.3k
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 281.3k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 507.8k
- Materials Chemistry 679.8k
Countries citing scholars working at Los Alamos National Laboratory
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Los Alamos National Laboratory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Los Alamos National Laboratory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Los Alamos National Laboratory more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Los Alamos National Laboratory
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Los Alamos National Laboratory at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Los Alamos National Laboratory at the time of their publication.
About Los Alamos National Laboratory
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Los Alamos National Laboratory have published 78.7k papers, which have received a total of 3.1M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 10.6k papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 5.9k papers in Radiation, 7.9k papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 14.7k papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 7.6k papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics on the topics of Nuclear Physics and Applications (4.4k papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (3.9k papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (3.6k papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (3.5k papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (3.1k papers), Nuclear physics research studies (3.1k papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (3.0k papers) and Rare-earth and actinide compounds (2.9k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nuclear and High Energy Physics (285.9k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (235.3k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (281.3k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (507.8k citations) and Materials Chemistry (679.8k citations). Authors at Los Alamos National Laboratory collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B, Condensed matter, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Journal of Applied Physics and Physical Review B. Some of Los Alamos National Laboratory's most productive authors include P. Jeffrey Hay, Willard R. Wadt, Alan S. Perelson, Victor I. Klimov, Thomas C. Terwilliger, C.W. Hirt, Wojciech H. Zurek, Geoffrey B. West, M. N. Rosenbluth and B.D. Nichols.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.