Sandia National Laboratories
Impact in
- Computational Mathematics top 0.1%
- Materials Chemistry top 0.5%
Papers in
-
- Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices 1.2k
-
- Semiconductor materials and devices 2.1k
- Photonic and Optical Devices 864
- Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis 846
- Top scholars
- C. Jeffrey BrinkerPeter J. FeibelmanStewart SillingTamara G. KoldaBrett W. BaderG. A. SamaraRonald L. ImanGary S. Grest
- Journals
- Applied Physics Letters (1.0k papers)Journal of Applied Physics (921 papers)IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science (623 papers)Physical review. B, Condensed matter (422 papers)Physical Review Letters (421 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Sandia National Laboratories
32.0k papers receiving 998.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 249
- Computational Mathematics 5.1k
- Materials Chemistry 291.7k
- Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 33.6k
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 292.0k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 149.7k
Countries citing scholars working at Sandia National Laboratories
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Sandia National Laboratories. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Sandia National Laboratories with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandia National Laboratories more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Sandia National Laboratories
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Sandia National Laboratories at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Sandia National Laboratories at the time of their publication.
About Sandia National Laboratories
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Sandia National Laboratories have published 34.2k papers, which have received a total of 1.0M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 5.8k papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 10.4k papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 3.6k papers in Computational Mechanics, 7.7k papers in Materials Chemistry and 3.8k papers in Mechanics of Materials on the topics of Semiconductor materials and devices (2.1k papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (1.3k papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (1.2k papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (1.0k papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (864 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (856 papers), Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis (846 papers) and Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (827 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Computational Mathematics (5.1k citations), Materials Chemistry (291.7k citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (33.6k citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (292.0k citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (149.7k citations). Authors at Sandia National Laboratories collaborate with scholars in United States, Germany and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Applied Physics, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Physical Review Letters. Some of Sandia National Laboratories's most productive authors include C. Jeffrey Brinker, Peter J. Feibelman, Stewart Silling, Tamara G. Kolda, Brett W. Bader, G. A. Samara, Ronald L. Iman, Gary S. Grest, David Emin and D. E. Grady.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.