Berry Consultants, LLC (United States)

18.0k citations
320 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Berry Consultants, LLC (United States)

252 papers receiving 13.4k citations

Peers

Berry Consultants, LLC (United States)
Comparison fields: 5 of 194
  • Statistics and Probability 2.1k
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 447
  • Neurology 1.4k
  • Cancer Research 1.2k
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.7k
Replace Pinnacle Clinical Research with:
Pinnacle Clinical Research United States
Cardiovascular Research Associates United States
Berry & Associates (United States) United States
Cancer Services United States
The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases United States
Texas Neurology United States
Arkansas Cardiology United States
Kidney Associates United States
Alliance Data (United States) United States
VA St. Louis Health Care System United States
Berry Consultants, LLC (United States) relative to Pinnacle Clinical Research United States Pinnacle Clinical Research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15.8×
Pinnacle Clinical Research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Berry Consultants, LLC (United States)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Berry Consultants, LLC (United States). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Berry Consultants, LLC (United States) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Berry Consultants, LLC (United States) more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Berry Consultants, LLC (United States)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Berry Consultants, LLC (United States) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Berry Consultants, LLC (United States) at the time of their publication.

About Berry Consultants, LLC (United States)

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Berry Consultants, LLC (United States) have published 320 papers, which have received a total of 18.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 93 papers in Statistics and Probability, 30 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 54 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 20 papers in Neurology and 2 papers in Health Informatics on the topics of Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (80 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (48 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (26 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (23 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (14 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (12 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (11 papers) and Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (10 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Statistics and Probability (2.1k citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (447 citations), Neurology (1.4k citations), Cancer Research (1.2k citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.7k citations). Authors at Berry Consultants, LLC (United States) collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including JAMA, Clinical Trials, Trials, Statistics in Medicine and New England Journal of Medicine. Some of Berry Consultants, LLC (United States)'s most productive authors include Roger Lewis, Scott Berry, Benjamin R. Saville, Kristine R. Broglio, Michelle A. Detry, Anna E. McGlothlin, Donald A. Berry, Jason T. Connor, Kert Viele and Mark Fitzgerald.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact