Institute for Women's Policy Research

35.4k citations
859 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Gender, Security, and Conflict 20
    • Intimate Partner and Family Violence 48

Institute for Women's Policy Research

694 papers receiving 27.8k citations

Peers

Institute for Women's Policy Research
Comparison fields: 5 of 223
  • Health 2.9k
  • Gender Studies 2.9k
  • Social Psychology 5.4k
  • Clinical Psychology 4.9k
  • Applied Psychology 1.1k
Replace American Psychological Association with:
American Psychological Association United States
Families USA United States
Office of Adolescent Health United States
Social Science Research Council United States
Child Trends United States
Stratford University United States
HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies United States
Western State Hospital United States
Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies United States
Office of Diversity and Inclusion United States
Institute for Women's Policy Research relative to American Psychological Association United States American Psychological Association's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
American Psychological Association · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute for Women's Policy Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute for Women's Policy Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute for Women's Policy Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute for Women's Policy Research more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute for Women's Policy Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute for Women's Policy Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute for Women's Policy Research at the time of their publication.

About Institute for Women's Policy Research

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute for Women's Policy Research have published 859 papers, which have received a total of 35.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 96 papers in Gender Studies, 60 papers in Health, 30 papers in Applied Psychology, 112 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 78 papers in Clinical Psychology on the topics of Intimate Partner and Family Violence (48 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (46 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (46 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (37 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (34 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (26 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (24 papers) and Gender, Security, and Conflict (20 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health (2.9k citations), Gender Studies (2.9k citations), Social Psychology (5.4k citations), Clinical Psychology (4.9k citations) and Applied Psychology (1.1k citations). Authors at Institute for Women's Policy Research collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Norway and have published in prestigious journals including Addictive Behaviors, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Journal of Adolescent Health, Nicotine & Tobacco Research and Substance Abuse. Some of Institute for Women's Policy Research's most productive authors include Sean Esteban McCabe, Carol J. Boyd, Jacquelynne S. Eccles, Brady Thomas West, Edward McAuley, Greg J. Duncan, Tonda L. Hughes, Philip Todd Veliz, James A. Cranford and Christian J. Teter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact