Institute for Women's Policy Research

44.5k citations
1.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics 29
    • Gender Diversity and Inequality 29
    • Intimate Partner and Family Violence 54

Institute for Women's Policy Research

982 papers receiving 35.5k citations

Peers

Institute for Women's Policy Research
Comparison fields: 5 of 229
  • Health 3.4k
  • Gender Studies 3.8k
  • Safety Research 2.6k
  • Social Psychology 6.2k
  • Clinical Psychology 5.7k
Replace Families USA with:
Families USA United States
American Psychological Association United States
Office of Adolescent Health United States
Wagner College United States
York College of Pennsylvania United States
National Development and Research Institutes United States
Social Science Research Council United States
Regent University United States
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration United States
University of Mary Washington United States
Institute for Women's Policy Research relative to Families USA United States Families USA's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Families USA · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute for Women's Policy Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute for Women's Policy Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute for Women's Policy Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute for Women's Policy Research more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute for Women's Policy Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute for Women's Policy Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute for Women's Policy Research at the time of their publication.

About Institute for Women's Policy Research

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute for Women's Policy Research have published 1.2k papers, which have received a total of 44.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 146 papers in Gender Studies, 73 papers in Health, 33 papers in Applied Psychology, 145 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 123 papers in General Health Professions on the topics of Intimate Partner and Family Violence (54 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (47 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (47 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (39 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (33 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (29 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (29 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (28 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health (3.4k citations), Gender Studies (3.8k citations), Safety Research (2.6k citations), Social Psychology (6.2k citations) and Clinical Psychology (5.7k citations). Authors at Institute for Women's Policy Research collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Addictive Behaviors, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Journal of Adolescent Health and Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health. Some of Institute for Women's Policy Research's most productive authors include Sean Esteban McCabe, Carol J. Boyd, Jacquelynne S. Eccles, Brady T. West, Edward McAuley, Greg J. Duncan, Tonda L. Hughes, Philip Veliz, Christian J. Teter and James A. Cranford.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact