Social Science Research Council

34.8k citations
1.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms 28
    • Health disparities and outcomes 35

Social Science Research Council

815 papers receiving 28.3k citations

Peers

Social Science Research Council
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
  • Aging 644
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 354
  • Applied Psychology 1.1k
  • Health 1.5k
  • Sociology and Political Science 9.2k
Replace Stratford University with:
Stratford University United States
Institute for Community Health United States
Emerson College United States
New York State University College of Human Ecology United States
Cambridge Hospital United States
New York State Department of State United States
Bishop's University Canada
New York State Office of Mental Health United States
University City Science Center United States
National Institute of Nursing Research United States
Social Science Research Council relative to Stratford University United States Stratford University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.9×
Stratford University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Social Science Research Council

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Social Science Research Council. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Social Science Research Council with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social Science Research Council more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Social Science Research Council

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Social Science Research Council at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Social Science Research Council at the time of their publication.

About Social Science Research Council

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Social Science Research Council have published 1.1k papers, which have received a total of 34.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 28 papers in Aging, 56 papers in Health, 228 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 20 papers in Applied Psychology and 107 papers in Political Science and International Relations on the topics of Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (54 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (35 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (28 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (26 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (20 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (20 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (20 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (19 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Aging (644 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (354 citations), Applied Psychology (1.1k citations), Health (1.5k citations) and Sociology and Political Science (9.2k citations). Authors at Social Science Research Council collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Denmark and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Public Opinion Quarterly, The Journals of Gerontology Series A, Alzheimer s & Dementia and Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. Some of Social Science Research Council's most productive authors include Warren S. Torgerson, Eric Hershberg, Craig Jackson Calhoun, Robin Dunbar, Martha Finnemore, Daniel W. Belsky, Bas Verplanken, Wendy Wood, Albert H. Cantril and Terrie E. Moffitt.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact