Institut des Sciences Humaines et Sociales

983 papers receiving 6.8k citations

Peers

Institut des Sciences Humaines et Sociales
Comparison fields: 5 of 228
  • Health 589
  • Theoretical Computer Science 81
  • Sociology and Political Science 2.8k
  • Urban Studies 304
  • General Health Professions 946
Replace Cambridge University Press with:
Cambridge University Press United Kingdom
Université Pierre Mendès France France
Amsterdam University of the Arts Netherlands
Homerton University Hospital United Kingdom
HES-SO Genève Switzerland
Laboratoire de Recherche Scientifique France
New College United Kingdom
Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine United Kingdom
Centre d’histoire de Sciences Po France
Victoria School of Management Switzerland
Institut des Sciences Humaines et Sociales relative to Cambridge University Press United Kingdom Cambridge University Press's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Cambridge University Press · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institut des Sciences Humaines et Sociales

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institut des Sciences Humaines et Sociales. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institut des Sciences Humaines et Sociales with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institut des Sciences Humaines et Sociales more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institut des Sciences Humaines et Sociales

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institut des Sciences Humaines et Sociales at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institut des Sciences Humaines et Sociales at the time of their publication.

About Institut des Sciences Humaines et Sociales

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institut des Sciences Humaines et Sociales have published 1.5k papers, which have received a total of 8.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 115 papers in Urban Studies, 23 papers in Theoretical Computer Science, 78 papers in History and Philosophy of Science, 504 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 108 papers in Anthropology on the topics of Education, sociology, and vocational training (125 papers), French Urban and Social Studies (121 papers), Social Sciences and Governance (108 papers), Healthcare Systems and Practices (95 papers), Social Policies and Family (81 papers), Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender (79 papers), Health, Medicine and Society (79 papers) and Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (72 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health (589 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (81 citations), Sociology and Political Science (2.8k citations), Urban Studies (304 citations) and General Health Professions (946 citations). Authors at Institut des Sciences Humaines et Sociales collaborate with scholars in France, Belgium and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Archives de sciences sociales des religions, Cahiers d études africaines, PLoS ONE, Health Research Policy and Systems and European Journal of Public Health. Some of Institut des Sciences Humaines et Sociales's most productive authors include Jocelyn Raude, Marco Martiniello, Marco Martiniello, Jean‐Michel Lafleur, François Gemenne, Benjamin Rubbers, Clive Hamilton, Christophe Bonneuil, Valeria Giardino and M. Bellanger.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact