Laboratoire de Recherche Scientifique

25.0k citations
1.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Laboratoire de Recherche Scientifique

940 papers receiving 23.2k citations

Peers

Laboratoire de Recherche Scientifique
Comparison fields: 5 of 240
  • Signal Processing 1.7k
  • Hepatology 1.0k
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 585
  • Metals and Alloys 239
  • Structural Biology 134
Replace Transnational University Limburg with:
Transnational University Limburg Belgium
Kodak (France) France
Royal Society United Kingdom
Direction de la Recherche Fondamentale France
Cambridge University Press United Kingdom
Mary Lyon Centre at MRC Harwell United Kingdom
Directorate-General Joint Research Centre Belgium
Center of Advanced European Studies and Research Germany
RELX Group (Netherlands) Netherlands
Institute for Scientific Interchange Italy
Laboratoire de Recherche Scientifique relative to Transnational University Limburg Belgium Transnational University Limburg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.6×
Transnational University Limburg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Laboratoire de Recherche Scientifique

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Laboratoire de Recherche Scientifique. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Laboratoire de Recherche Scientifique with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laboratoire de Recherche Scientifique more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Laboratoire de Recherche Scientifique

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Laboratoire de Recherche Scientifique at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Laboratoire de Recherche Scientifique at the time of their publication.

About Laboratoire de Recherche Scientifique

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Laboratoire de Recherche Scientifique have published 1.1k papers, which have received a total of 25.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 21 papers in Theoretical Computer Science, 46 papers in History and Philosophy of Science, 15 papers in Metals and Alloys, 37 papers in Anthropology and 17 papers in Linguistics and Language on the topics of Education, sociology, and vocational training (29 papers), Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition (27 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (26 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (25 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (23 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (22 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (21 papers) and Concrete Corrosion and Durability (19 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Signal Processing (1.7k citations), Hepatology (1.0k citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (585 citations), Metals and Alloys (239 citations) and Structural Biology (134 citations). Authors at Laboratoire de Recherche Scientifique collaborate with scholars in France, Morocco and United States and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, PLoS neglected tropical diseases, Drying Technology, Journal of Statistical Physics and Mechanism and Machine Theory. Some of Laboratoire de Recherche Scientifique's most productive authors include J.-F. Cardoso, Valérie Paradis, Pierre Bédossa, Delphine Dargère, C. PAQUOT, İskender Gökalp, E. Rosencher, Ph. Bois, Christian Chauveau and Dinh-Tuan Pham.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact