Indian Institute of Forest Management
Impact in
-
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Forestry top 10%
Papers in
- Forestry 19
-
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management 62
- Forest Management and Policy 28
- Top scholars
- Chandra Prakash KalaBhaskar SinhaDeep Narayan PandeyKamaljit S. BawaProdyut BhattacharyaArvind BijalwanR. K. MaikhuriRekha Singhal
- Journals
- Journal of Forestry Research (7 papers)The International Forestry Review (6 papers)Journal of Sustainable Forestry (4 papers)Environment Development and Sustainability (4 papers)Macromolecular Symposia (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Indian Institute of Forest Management
291 papers receiving 4.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 173
- Global and Planetary Change 1.4k
- Forestry 266
- Ecological Modeling 205
- Soil Science 435
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 437
Countries citing scholars working at Indian Institute of Forest Management
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Indian Institute of Forest Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Indian Institute of Forest Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Indian Institute of Forest Management more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Indian Institute of Forest Management
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Indian Institute of Forest Management at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Indian Institute of Forest Management at the time of their publication.
About Indian Institute of Forest Management
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Indian Institute of Forest Management have published 366 papers, which have received a total of 4.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 19 papers in Forestry, 94 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 17 papers in Ecological Modeling, 7 papers in Business and International Management and 39 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation on the topics of Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (62 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (28 papers), Forest Management and Policy (28 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (23 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (22 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (18 papers), Forest ecology and management (18 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (17 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Global and Planetary Change (1.4k citations), Forestry (266 citations), Ecological Modeling (205 citations), Soil Science (435 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (437 citations). Authors at Indian Institute of Forest Management collaborate with scholars in India, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Forestry Research, The International Forestry Review, Journal of Sustainable Forestry, Environment Development and Sustainability and Macromolecular Symposia. Some of Indian Institute of Forest Management's most productive authors include Chandra Prakash Kala, Bhaskar Sinha, Deep Narayan Pandey, Kamaljit S. Bawa, Prodyut Bhattacharya, Arvind Bijalwan, R. K. Maikhuri, Rekha Singhal, Shashidhar Kumar Jha and Rajiv Pandey.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.