Arid Forest Research Institute

2.2k citations
259 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Arid Forest Research Institute

227 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Arid Forest Research Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Forestry 198
  • Soil Science 290
  • Plant Science 1.1k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 322
  • Insect Science 183
Replace National Institute of Ecology with:
National Institute of Ecology India
Indian Institute of Forest Management India
Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali Uttarakhand University of Horticulture & Forestry India
Directorate of Groundnut Research India
ICAR-Directorate of Rapeseed-Mustard Research, Bharatpur India
WWF-India India
National Research Centre for Integrated Pest Management India
Central Institute For Subtropical Horticulture India
Tropical Forest Research Institute India
Borlaug Institute for South Asia India
Arid Forest Research Institute relative to National Institute of Ecology India National Institute of Ecology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
National Institute of Ecology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Arid Forest Research Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Arid Forest Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Arid Forest Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arid Forest Research Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Arid Forest Research Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Arid Forest Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Arid Forest Research Institute at the time of their publication.

About Arid Forest Research Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Arid Forest Research Institute have published 259 papers, which have received a total of 2.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 35 papers in Forestry, 59 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 38 papers in Soil Science, 134 papers in Plant Science and 25 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science on the topics of Forest ecology and management (38 papers), Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems (27 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (23 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (21 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (17 papers), Irrigation Practices and Water Management (16 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (16 papers) and Tree Root and Stability Studies (12 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Forestry (198 citations), Soil Science (290 citations), Plant Science (1.1k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (322 citations) and Insect Science (183 citations). Authors at Arid Forest Research Institute collaborate with scholars in India, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Bioresource Technology, Journal of Forestry Research, Forest Ecology and Management, Journal of Arid Environments and Environmental Conservation. Some of Arid Forest Research Institute's most productive authors include G. Singh, V. P. Tewari, G. N. Gupta, H. S. Ginwal, Pravin Rawat, Pradeep Chaudhry, Shyam S. Phartyal, Tanmaya Kumar Bhoi, Y. C. Tripathi and Klaus von Gadow.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact