Arid Forest Research Institute

2.7k citations
313 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Arid Forest Research Institute

274 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Arid Forest Research Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Forestry 254
  • Plant Science 1.3k
  • Soil Science 327
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 353
  • Horticulture 25
Replace National Institute of Ecology with:
National Institute of Ecology India
Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali Uttarakhand University of Horticulture & Forestry India
Indian Institute of Soybean Research India
Dolphin (PG) Institute of Bio Medical and Natural Science India
Directorate of Groundnut Research India
ICAR-Directorate of Rapeseed-Mustard Research, Bharatpur India
National Research Centre for Integrated Pest Management India
Central Institute For Subtropical Horticulture India
Tropical Forest Research Institute India
National Research Centre on Seed Spices India
Arid Forest Research Institute relative to National Institute of Ecology India National Institute of Ecology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
National Institute of Ecology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Arid Forest Research Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Arid Forest Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Arid Forest Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arid Forest Research Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Arid Forest Research Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Arid Forest Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Arid Forest Research Institute at the time of their publication.

About Arid Forest Research Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Arid Forest Research Institute have published 313 papers, which have received a total of 2.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 38 papers in Forestry, 59 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 171 papers in Plant Science, 42 papers in Soil Science and 27 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science on the topics of Forest ecology and management (38 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (32 papers), Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems (30 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (22 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (17 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (17 papers), Irrigation Practices and Water Management (16 papers) and Genetics and Plant Breeding (14 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Forestry (254 citations), Plant Science (1.3k citations), Soil Science (327 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (353 citations) and Horticulture (25 citations). Authors at Arid Forest Research Institute collaborate with scholars in India, Nepal and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Forestry Research, Forest Ecology and Management, Bioresource Technology, Journal of Arid Environments and Silvae genetica. Some of Arid Forest Research Institute's most productive authors include G. Singh, V. P. Tewari, G. N. Gupta, H. S. Ginwal, Pravin Rawat, Pradeep Chaudhry, Tanmaya Kumar Bhoi, Ipsita Samal, Shyam S. Phartyal and Deepak Kumar Mahanta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact