Arid Forest Research Institute

2.6k citations
304 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Arid Forest Research Institute

267 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Arid Forest Research Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Forestry 244
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 256
  • Waste Management and Disposal 139
  • Plant Science 787
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 214
Replace Directorate of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research with:
Directorate of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research India
Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali Uttarakhand University of Horticulture & Forestry India
Indian Institute of Forest Management India
Indian Institute of Soybean Research India
Borlaug Institute for South Asia India
Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare India
ICAR-Indian Institute of Farming Systems Research India
ICAR-Directorate of Rapeseed-Mustard Research, Bharatpur India
Institute of Sustainable Halophyte Utilization
ICAR-Indian Institute of Maize Research India
Arid Forest Research Institute relative to Directorate of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research India Directorate of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.8×
Directorate of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Arid Forest Research Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Arid Forest Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Arid Forest Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arid Forest Research Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Arid Forest Research Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Arid Forest Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Arid Forest Research Institute at the time of their publication.

About Arid Forest Research Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Arid Forest Research Institute have published 304 papers, which have received a total of 2.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 43 papers in Forestry, 48 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 96 papers in Plant Science, 15 papers in Waste Management and Disposal and 29 papers in Soil Science on the topics of Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems (27 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (27 papers), Forest ecology and management (24 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (19 papers), Wastewater Treatment and Reuse (15 papers), Plant Ecology and Soil Science (13 papers), Seed Germination and Physiology (12 papers) and Forest Ecology and Conservation (11 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Forestry (244 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (256 citations), Waste Management and Disposal (139 citations), Plant Science (787 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (214 citations). Authors at Arid Forest Research Institute collaborate with scholars in India, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Bioresource Technology, Journal of Forestry Research, Journal of Arid Environments, Forest Ecology and Management and Industrial Crops and Products. Some of Arid Forest Research Institute's most productive authors include Genda Singh, V. P. Tewari, Harish Singh Ginwal, Pravin Rawat, Tanmaya Kumar Bhoi, Pradeep Chaudhry, Ipsita Samal, Deepak Kumar Mahanta, Sarita Arya and Shyam Singh Phartyal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact