Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos
Impact in
- Law top 10%
- Criminal Justice and Penology
- Legal processes and jurisprudence
Papers in
- Law 101
- Legal processes and jurisprudence 48
- Criminal Justice and Penology 47
-
- Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies 126
- Political Dynamics in Latin America 16
- Comparative International Legal Studies 13
- Top scholars
- Maristella SvampaJacques AvelinoBenoît BertrandHervé EtienneRolando CerdaClémentine AllinneSerge SavaryLaetitia Willocquet
- Journals
- Acta Paulista de Enfermagem (77 papers)Araucaria (6 papers)Ius et Praxis (3 papers)Estudios constitucionales (2 papers)Revista de Estudios Sociales (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- Costa RicaBrazilSpain
In The Last Decade
Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos
279 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
- Horticulture 36
- Law 155
- Occupational Therapy 46
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 13
- Political Science and International Relations 221
Countries citing scholars working at Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos at the time of their publication.
About Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos have published 390 papers, which have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 101 papers in Law, 169 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 2 papers in Industrial relations, 12 papers in Occupational Therapy and 9 papers in General Social Sciences on the topics of Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies (126 papers), Human Rights and Immigration (48 papers), Legal processes and jurisprudence (48 papers), Criminal Justice and Penology (47 papers), Health, Nursing, Elderly Care (18 papers), Political Dynamics in Latin America (16 papers), Comparative International Legal Studies (13 papers) and Gender, Violence, Rights in Latin America (13 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Horticulture (36 citations), Law (155 citations), Occupational Therapy (46 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (13 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (221 citations). Authors at Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos collaborate with scholars in Costa Rica, Brazil and Spain and have published in prestigious journals including Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, Araucaria, Ius et Praxis, Estudios constitucionales and Revista de Estudios Sociales. Some of Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos's most productive authors include Maristella Svampa, Jacques Avelino, Benoît Bertrand, Hervé Etienne, Rolando Cerda, Clémentine Allinne, Serge Savary, Laetitia Willocquet, Bernardo Kliksberg and Raquel Sampaio Florêncio.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.