Ius et Praxis

614 papers and 1.3k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 614 papers published in Ius et Praxis in the last decades have received a total of 1.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Ius et Praxis usually cover Law (481 papers), Political Science and International Relations (481 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (140 papers) specifically the topics of Legal processes and jurisprudence (357 papers), Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies (308 papers) and Comparative International Legal Studies (220 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ius et Praxis are Humberto Nogueira Alcalá, Ricardo Haro, Íñigo de la Maza Gazmuri, Michele Taruffo, P. Aguilera, Luiz Guilherme Marinoni, John Fernando Restrepo Tamayo, Mahía Saracostti, Francisco Infante and Carlos del Valle Rojas.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Ius et Praxis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ius et Praxis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ius et Praxis.

Countries where authors publish in Ius et Praxis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ius et Praxis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ius et Praxis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ius et Praxis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026