Institute of Geochemistry
Impact in
- Geochemistry and Petrology top 0.2%
- Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
- Geophysics top 1%
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- earthquake and tectonic studies
- High-pressure geophysics and materials
Papers in
-
- Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis 919
- Geophysics 2.6k
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis 2.3k
- earthquake and tectonic studies 1.0k
- High-pressure geophysics and materials 990
- Top scholars
- Xinbin FengCong‐Qiang LiuMei‐Fu ZhouRuizhong HuGuangle QiuShijie WangLiang QiGuilin Han
- Journals
- Ore Geology Reviews (359 papers)The Science of The Total Environment (236 papers)Chemical Geology (170 papers)Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta (156 papers)Environmental Science & Technology (153 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Institute of Geochemistry
7.3k papers receiving 210.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 225
- Geochemistry and Petrology 36.7k
- Geophysics 57.4k
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 43.8k
- Pollution 37.2k
- Environmental Chemistry 20.7k
Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Geochemistry
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Geochemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Geochemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Geochemistry more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Geochemistry
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Geochemistry at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Geochemistry at the time of their publication.
About Institute of Geochemistry
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Geochemistry have published 7.9k papers, which have received a total of 214.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.5k papers in Geochemistry and Petrology, 2.6k papers in Geophysics, 1.3k papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 1.1k papers in Pollution and 752 papers in Environmental Chemistry on the topics of Geological and Geochemical Analysis (2.3k papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (1.3k papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (1.0k papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (990 papers), Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis (919 papers), Mercury impact and mitigation studies (909 papers), Heavy metals in environment (858 papers) and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (667 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Geochemistry and Petrology (36.7k citations), Geophysics (57.4k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (43.8k citations), Pollution (37.2k citations) and Environmental Chemistry (20.7k citations). Authors at Institute of Geochemistry collaborate with scholars in China, United States and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Ore Geology Reviews, The Science of The Total Environment, Chemical Geology, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta and Environmental Science & Technology. Some of Institute of Geochemistry's most productive authors include Xinbin Feng, Cong‐Qiang Liu, Mei‐Fu Zhou, Ruizhong Hu, Guangle Qiu, Shijie Wang, Liang Qi, Liang Qi, Guilin Han and Lihai Shang.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.