Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry
Impact in
- Geophysics top 0.2%
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- earthquake and tectonic studies
- High-pressure geophysics and materials
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis top 0.5%
- Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
- Air Quality and Health Impacts
Papers in
- Geophysics 3.5k
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis 3.3k
- earthquake and tectonic studies 1.9k
- High-pressure geophysics and materials 1.8k
-
- Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact 1.4k
- Air Quality and Health Impacts 900
- Top scholars
- Xian‐Hua LiYi‐Gang XuGuang‐Guo YingGan ZhangZheng‐Xiang LiHe HongpingBi-Xian MaiJiamo Fu
- Journals
- The Science of The Total Environment (402 papers)Environmental Science & Technology (358 papers)Lithos (355 papers)Environmental Pollution (313 papers)Ore Geology Reviews (301 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry
10.3k papers receiving 444.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 236
- Geophysics 152.3k
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 100.7k
- Pollution 80.4k
- Geochemistry and Petrology 35.5k
- Geology 20.7k
Countries citing scholars working at Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry at the time of their publication.
About Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry have published 10.9k papers, which have received a total of 454.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 3.5k papers in Geophysics, 2.4k papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 973 papers in Geochemistry and Petrology, 1.5k papers in Pollution and 632 papers in Geology on the topics of Geological and Geochemical Analysis (3.3k papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (1.9k papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (1.8k papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (1.5k papers), Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (1.4k papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (1.3k papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (1.1k papers) and Air Quality and Health Impacts (900 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Geophysics (152.3k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (100.7k citations), Pollution (80.4k citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (35.5k citations) and Geology (20.7k citations). Authors at Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry collaborate with scholars in China, United States and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including The Science of The Total Environment, Environmental Science & Technology, Lithos, Environmental Pollution and Ore Geology Reviews. Some of Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry's most productive authors include Xian‐Hua Li, Yi‐Gang Xu, Guang‐Guo Ying, Gan Zhang, Zheng‐Xiang Li, He Hongping, Bi-Xian Mai, Jiamo Fu, Xinming Wang and Weiming Fan.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.