IFP Énergies nouvelles

282.2k citations
9.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

IFP Énergies nouvelles

8.9k papers receiving 281.5k citations

Peers

IFP Énergies nouvelles
Comparison fields: 5 of 228
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 17.2k
  • Catalysis 10.4k
  • Ocean Engineering 26.7k
  • Geology 11.4k
  • Geophysics 21.8k
Replace Shell (Netherlands) with:
Shell (Netherlands) Netherlands
BP (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Paul Scherrer Institute Switzerland
Total (France) France
Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour France
Shell (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Clausthal University of Technology Germany
TU Bergakademie Freiberg Germany
Equinor (Norway) Norway
Max Planck Institute for Chemistry Germany
IFP Énergies nouvelles relative to Shell (Netherlands) Netherlands Shell (Netherlands)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Shell (Netherlands) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at IFP Énergies nouvelles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at IFP Énergies nouvelles. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at IFP Énergies nouvelles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites IFP Énergies nouvelles more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at IFP Énergies nouvelles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with IFP Énergies nouvelles at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with IFP Énergies nouvelles at the time of their publication.

About IFP Énergies nouvelles

In recent decades, authors affiliated with IFP Énergies nouvelles have published 9.1k papers, which have received a total of 282.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.4k papers in Ocean Engineering, 685 papers in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, 780 papers in Geophysics, 322 papers in Geochemistry and Petrology and 339 papers in Geology on the topics of Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (660 papers), Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques (640 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (568 papers), Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis (470 papers), Petroleum Processing and Analysis (460 papers), Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques (418 papers), Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (392 papers) and Geological formations and processes (310 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (17.2k citations), Catalysis (10.4k citations), Ocean Engineering (26.7k citations), Geology (11.4k citations) and Geophysics (21.8k citations). Authors at IFP Énergies nouvelles collaborate with scholars in France, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles, SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Chemical Engineering Science, Journal of Catalysis and Energy & Fuels. Some of IFP Énergies nouvelles's most productive authors include Bernard P. Tissot, Dietrich H. Welte, Pascal Raybaud, François Lorant, H. Toulhoat, F. Béhar, Yves Chauvin, Antonio Sciarretta, William Goddard and Adri C. T. van Duin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact