Institute of Forensic Sciences

5.6k citations
371 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Institute of Forensic Sciences

323 papers receiving 5.0k citations

Peers

Institute of Forensic Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 201
  • Toxicology 939
  • Emergency Medicine 758
  • Insect Science 388
  • Archeology 274
  • Small Animals 190
Replace Bexar County Medical Examiner's Office with:
Bexar County Medical Examiner's Office United States
Tarrant County College United States
Alabama Department of Forensic Sciences United States
Montrose Center United States
Harding University Main Campus United States
Overton Brooks VA Medical Center United States
St. Gregory's University United States
Dade County Medical Examiner Department United States
Universidad del Ejército y Fuerza Aérea Mexico
Naval Hospital Jacksonville United States
Institute of Forensic Sciences relative to Bexar County Medical Examiner's Office United States Bexar County Medical Examiner's Office's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Bexar County Medical Examiner's Office · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Forensic Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Forensic Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Forensic Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Forensic Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Forensic Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Forensic Sciences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Forensic Sciences at the time of their publication.

About Institute of Forensic Sciences

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Forensic Sciences have published 371 papers, which have received a total of 5.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 48 papers in Toxicology, 53 papers in Emergency Medicine, 2 papers in Chemical Health and Safety, 29 papers in Archeology and 16 papers in Ophthalmology on the topics of Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (47 papers), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (35 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (27 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (26 papers), Restraint-Related Deaths (24 papers), Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (20 papers), Poisoning and overdose treatments (18 papers) and Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (17 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Toxicology (939 citations), Emergency Medicine (758 citations), Insect Science (388 citations), Archeology (274 citations) and Small Animals (190 citations). Authors at Institute of Forensic Sciences collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Türkiye and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Forensic Sciences, Journal of Analytical Toxicology, American Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology, Journal of Medical Entomology and Journal of Forensic Nursing. Some of Institute of Forensic Sciences's most productive authors include James C. Garriott, Michelle R. Sanford, James E. Meeker, E.H. Foerster, Dwayne A. Wolf, Jennifer C. Love, Jeffrey J. Barnard, Jeffrey P. Walterscheid, María A. Martínez and Ashraf Mozayani.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact