Institute of Forensic Sciences

6.4k citations
391 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Institute of Forensic Sciences

340 papers receiving 5.7k citations

Peers

Institute of Forensic Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 205
  • Toxicology 1.0k
  • Emergency Medicine 855
  • Insect Science 420
  • Archeology 362
  • Small Animals 210
Replace Bexar County Medical Examiner's Office with:
Bexar County Medical Examiner's Office United States
Civil Aerospace Medical Institute United States
Tarrant County College United States
Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation United States
Harding University Main Campus United States
Montrose Center United States
Overton Brooks VA Medical Center United States
Dade County Medical Examiner Department United States
Lovelace Clinic Foundation Research United States
Mississippi State Department of Health United States
Institute of Forensic Sciences relative to Bexar County Medical Examiner's Office United States Bexar County Medical Examiner's Office's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Bexar County Medical Examiner's Office · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Forensic Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Forensic Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Forensic Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Forensic Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Forensic Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Forensic Sciences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Forensic Sciences at the time of their publication.

About Institute of Forensic Sciences

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Forensic Sciences have published 391 papers, which have received a total of 6.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 52 papers in Toxicology, 58 papers in Emergency Medicine, 2 papers in Chemical Health and Safety, 32 papers in Archeology and 18 papers in Ophthalmology on the topics of Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (51 papers), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (33 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (30 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (29 papers), Restraint-Related Deaths (29 papers), Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (21 papers), Poisoning and overdose treatments (19 papers) and Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (17 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Toxicology (1.0k citations), Emergency Medicine (855 citations), Insect Science (420 citations), Archeology (362 citations) and Small Animals (210 citations). Authors at Institute of Forensic Sciences collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Türkiye and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Forensic Sciences, Journal of Analytical Toxicology, American Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology, Journal of Medical Entomology and Clinical Toxicology. Some of Institute of Forensic Sciences's most productive authors include James C. Garriott, Michelle R. Sanford, James E. Meeker, Jennifer C. Love, Dwayne A. Wolf, Jeffrey J. Barnard, Louis Maximilian Buja, Charles S. Petty, María Antonia Martínez and Jeffrey P. Walterscheid.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact