ICF International (United States)

64.9k citations
2.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

ICF International (United States)

1.8k papers receiving 53.3k citations

Peers

ICF International (United States)
Comparison fields: 5 of 243
  • Finance 3.8k
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 4.5k
  • Infectious Diseases 4.9k
  • Health 2.1k
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2.3k
Replace United States Department of State with:
United States Department of State United States
United Nations United States
Abt Global (United States) United States
Resources For The Future United States
Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars United States
Rogers (United States) United States
Wagner College United States
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation United States
Economic Research Service United States
Policy Analysis (United States) United States
ICF International (United States) relative to United States Department of State United States United States Department of State's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.9×
United States Department of State · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at ICF International (United States)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at ICF International (United States). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at ICF International (United States) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ICF International (United States) more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at ICF International (United States)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with ICF International (United States) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with ICF International (United States) at the time of their publication.

About ICF International (United States)

In recent decades, authors affiliated with ICF International (United States) have published 2.1k papers, which have received a total of 64.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 12 papers in Chemical Health and Safety, 214 papers in Infectious Diseases, 165 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 242 papers in General Health Professions and 72 papers in Health on the topics of HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (187 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (120 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (96 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (76 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (75 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (73 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (44 papers) and Malaria Research and Control (43 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Finance (3.8k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (4.5k citations), Infectious Diseases (4.9k citations), Health (2.1k citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (2.3k citations). Authors at ICF International (United States) collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, AIDS and Behavior, AIDS Care, Malaria Journal and JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. Some of ICF International (United States)'s most productive authors include Gian Maria Milesi‐Ferretti, Philip R. Lane, Giovanni Dell’Ariccia, Kenneth E. Powell, Harvey J. Clewell, Melvin E. Andersen, Lianyang Zhang, Robert Marquez, Katrina L. Piercy and Rick Nevin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact