Chicago Department of Public Health
Impact in
- Health top 2%
- Health disparities and outcomes
- General Health Professions top 2%
Papers in
-
- Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health 92
- Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations 77
- Health 153
- Health disparities and outcomes 85
- Top scholars
- Donald HedekerKate E. PickettRobert J. SampsonDiane S. LauderdalePaul J. RathouzGary L. AlbrechtPATRICK J. DEVLIEGERLisa Marie Powell
- Journals
- Journal of Public Health Management and Practice (55 papers)JAMA Network Open (53 papers)AIDS and Behavior (50 papers)PLoS ONE (44 papers)Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (41 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaChina
In The Last Decade
Chicago Department of Public Health
3.2k papers receiving 98.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 244
- Health 5.8k
- General Health Professions 14.6k
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 8.0k
- Infectious Diseases 7.8k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 10.5k
Countries citing scholars working at Chicago Department of Public Health
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Chicago Department of Public Health. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Chicago Department of Public Health with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chicago Department of Public Health more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Chicago Department of Public Health
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Chicago Department of Public Health at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Chicago Department of Public Health at the time of their publication.
About Chicago Department of Public Health
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Chicago Department of Public Health have published 4.3k papers, which have received a total of 128.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 590 papers in General Health Professions, 153 papers in Health, 149 papers in Statistics and Probability, 309 papers in Infectious Diseases and 211 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis on the topics of HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (195 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (155 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (103 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (93 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (92 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (92 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (85 papers) and Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (77 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health (5.8k citations), General Health Professions (14.6k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (8.0k citations), Infectious Diseases (7.8k citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (10.5k citations). Authors at Chicago Department of Public Health collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and China and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, JAMA Network Open, AIDS and Behavior, PLoS ONE and Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. Some of Chicago Department of Public Health's most productive authors include Donald Hedeker, Kate E. Pickett, Robert J. Sampson, Diane S. Lauderdale, Paul J. Rathouz, Gary L. Albrecht, PATRICK J. DEVLIEGER, Lisa Marie Powell, Naoko Muramatsu and Habibul Ahsan.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.