Instituto de Ciências Farmacêuticas

2.7k papers receiving 54.5k citations

Peers

Instituto de Ciências Farmacêuticas
Comparison fields: 5 of 223
  • Pharmaceutical Science 2.9k
  • Food Science 8.4k
  • Toxicology 1.5k
  • Biochemistry 2.3k
  • Biotechnology 2.2k
Replace Universidade Federal de Alfenas with:
Universidade Federal de Alfenas Brazil
Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia Brazil
Universidade de Sorocaba Brazil
Universidade de Franca Brazil
Instituto Adolfo Lutz Brazil
Universidade Estadual de Goiás Brazil
Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados Brazil
Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro Brazil
Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Brazil
Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco Brazil
Instituto de Ciências Farmacêuticas relative to Universidade Federal de Alfenas Brazil Universidade Federal de Alfenas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Universidade Federal de Alfenas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Instituto de Ciências Farmacêuticas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Instituto de Ciências Farmacêuticas. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Instituto de Ciências Farmacêuticas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Instituto de Ciências Farmacêuticas more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Instituto de Ciências Farmacêuticas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Instituto de Ciências Farmacêuticas at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Instituto de Ciências Farmacêuticas at the time of their publication.

About Instituto de Ciências Farmacêuticas

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Instituto de Ciências Farmacêuticas have published 3.1k papers, which have received a total of 58.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 72 papers in Toxicology, 130 papers in Pharmaceutical Science, 359 papers in Food Science, 60 papers in Forestry and 144 papers in Analytical Chemistry on the topics of Trypanosoma species research and implications (102 papers), Public Health in Brazil (87 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (87 papers), Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications (86 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (82 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (79 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (76 papers) and Fungal Infections and Studies (74 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Pharmaceutical Science (2.9k citations), Food Science (8.4k citations), Toxicology (1.5k citations), Biochemistry (2.3k citations) and Biotechnology (2.2k citations). Authors at Instituto de Ciências Farmacêuticas collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Argentina and have published in prestigious journals including RSC Advances, Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia, New Journal of Chemistry, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis and Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. Some of Instituto de Ciências Farmacêuticas's most productive authors include Hélio A. Stefani, Bernadette Dora Gombossy de Melo Franco, José Alfredo Gomes Arêas, Hérida Regina Nunes Salgado, Franco Maria Lajolo, Reinaldo Nóbrega de Almeida, Gustavo H. Goldman, Maria José Soares Mendes‐Giannini, Gisele Monteiro and Susana Marta Isay Saad.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact