Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados

52.8k citations
6.7k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados

5.4k papers receiving 48.7k citations

Peers

Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
  • Forestry 1.9k
  • Soil Science 3.6k
  • Insect Science 4.4k
  • Food Science 6.4k
  • Plant Science 12.9k
Replace Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul with:
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul Brazil
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná Brazil
Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul Brazil
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa Brazil
Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste Brazil
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso Brazil
Universidade Estadual de Londrina Brazil
Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul Brazil
Instituto Federal Goiano Brazil
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina Brazil
Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados relative to Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul Brazil Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados at the time of their publication.

About Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados have published 6.7k papers, which have received a total of 52.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 398 papers in Forestry, 606 papers in Soil Science, 1.6k papers in Plant Science, 433 papers in Animal Science and Zoology and 510 papers in Insect Science on the topics of Growth and nutrition in plants (578 papers), Soil Management and Crop Yield (526 papers), Education Pedagogy and Practices (328 papers), Agricultural and Food Sciences (298 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (270 papers), Rural Development and Agriculture (254 papers), Plant and animal studies (249 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (209 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Forestry (1.9k citations), Soil Science (3.6k citations), Insect Science (4.4k citations), Food Science (6.4k citations) and Plant Science (12.9k citations). Authors at Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Belgium and have published in prestigious journals including Engenharia Agrícola, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, PLoS ONE, Ciência e Agrotecnologia and Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. Some of Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados's most productive authors include Cláudia Andréa Lima Cardoso, Júlio Croda, Gustavo Graciano Fonseca, Maria do Carmo Vieira, Farayde Matta Fakhouri, João Augusto Rossi Borges, Cândida Aparecida Leite Kassuya, Fernando César Paiva Dagosta, Simone Simionatto and Silvana de Paula Quintão Scalon.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact