Universidade de Sorocaba

56.1k citations
3.4k papers ·

Impact in

  • Biomaterials top 10%
    • Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
    • Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
    • biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
    • Advanced Drug Delivery Systems

Papers in

Universidade de Sorocaba

2.8k papers receiving 51.4k citations

Peers

Universidade de Sorocaba
Comparison fields: 5 of 241
  • Biomaterials 6.8k
  • Pharmaceutical Science 2.9k
  • Pollution 3.5k
  • Molecular Medicine 1.1k
  • Biomedical Engineering 10.4k
Replace Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa with:
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa Brazil
Universidade Federal de Alfenas Brazil
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto Brazil
Federal University of São João del-Rei Brazil
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto Brazil
Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste Brazil
Universidade São Francisco Brazil
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina Brazil
Instituto de Pesquisas Tecnológicas Brazil
Universidade de Caxias do Sul Brazil
Universidade de Sorocaba relative to Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa Brazil Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Universidade de Sorocaba

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidade de Sorocaba. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidade de Sorocaba with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidade de Sorocaba more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Universidade de Sorocaba

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidade de Sorocaba at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidade de Sorocaba at the time of their publication.

About Universidade de Sorocaba

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidade de Sorocaba have published 3.4k papers, which have received a total of 56.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 103 papers in Pharmaceutical Science, 133 papers in Pollution, 20 papers in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 41 papers in Forestry and 139 papers in Water Science and Technology on the topics of Education Pedagogy and Practices (118 papers), Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (86 papers), Plant and animal studies (83 papers), Education and Public Policy (63 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (62 papers), Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (60 papers), Business and Management Studies (56 papers) and Water Quality and Pollution Assessment (55 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biomaterials (6.8k citations), Pharmaceutical Science (2.9k citations), Pollution (3.5k citations), Molecular Medicine (1.1k citations) and Biomedical Engineering (10.4k citations). Authors at Universidade de Sorocaba collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Portugal and have published in prestigious journals including Scientific Reports, BMJ Open, Frontiers in Pharmacology, Phytotaxa and PLoS ONE. Some of Universidade de Sorocaba's most productive authors include Leonardo Fernandes Fraceto, Renata de Lima, Estefânia Vangelie Ramos Campos, Renato Grillo, Anderson do Espírito Santo Pereira, Jhones Luiz de Oliveira, Marco V. Chaud, Jayanta Kumar Patra, Gitishree Das and Mariana Guilger‐Casagrande.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact