George Fox University

13.4k citations
1.0k papers ·

Impact in

  • Health top 10%
    • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
    • Counseling Practices and Supervision
    • Mentoring and Academic Development

Papers in

    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation 50
    • Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment 38
    • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 86

George Fox University

818 papers receiving 11.7k citations

Peers

George Fox University
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
  • Health 945
  • Social Psychology 2.2k
  • Clinical Psychology 1.9k
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 554
  • Applied Psychology 285
Replace Pacific University Oregon with:
Pacific University Oregon United States
Southern Oregon University United States
Western Oregon University United States
Pacific Lutheran University United States
University of the Fraser Valley Canada
City University of Seattle United States
Trinity Western University Canada
Eugene Research Institute United States
Oregon Department of Education United States
Saint Mary's College of California United States
George Fox University relative to Pacific University Oregon United States Pacific University Oregon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Pacific University Oregon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at George Fox University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at George Fox University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at George Fox University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Fox University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at George Fox University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with George Fox University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with George Fox University at the time of their publication.

About George Fox University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with George Fox University have published 1.0k papers, which have received a total of 13.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 100 papers in Religious studies, 95 papers in Health, 14 papers in General Psychology, 144 papers in Social Psychology and 129 papers in Clinical Psychology on the topics of Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (86 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (51 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (50 papers), Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (38 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (36 papers), Religious Education and Schools (29 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (29 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (25 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health (945 citations), Social Psychology (2.2k citations), Clinical Psychology (1.9k citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (554 citations) and Applied Psychology (285 citations). Authors at George Fox University collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Psychology and Theology, Professional Psychology Research and Practice, Journal of Experimental Biology, Royal Society Open Science and Foot & Ankle International. Some of George Fox University's most productive authors include Donald R. Powers, Mark R. McMinn, Bret W. Tobalske, W. Brad Johnson, Douglas R. Warrick, Christopher Koch, Jeff R Houck, Lorraine DeKruyf, Judith G. Smetana and Diane K. Schooley.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact