Universidade Federal do Rio Grande

208.1k citations
14.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande

12.5k papers receiving 208k citations

Peers

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande
Comparison fields: 5 of 248
  • Aquatic Science 13.7k
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 16.6k
  • Oceanography 12.4k
  • Pollution 10.7k
  • Ecology 18.9k
Replace National University of Mar del Plata with:
National University of Mar del Plata Argentina
Universidade Estadual de Maringá Brazil
Universidade Federal de Pelotas Brazil
Universidad Nacional del Litoral Argentina
Universidade Estadual de Londrina Brazil
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina Brazil
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná Brazil
Universidade Federal de Viçosa Brazil
Universidade Federal de Lavras Brazil
Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro Brazil
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande relative to National University of Mar del Plata Argentina National University of Mar del Plata's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
National University of Mar del Plata · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Universidade Federal do Rio Grande

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidade Federal do Rio Grande. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidade Federal do Rio Grande with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidade Federal do Rio Grande more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Universidade Federal do Rio Grande

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidade Federal do Rio Grande at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidade Federal do Rio Grande at the time of their publication.

About Universidade Federal do Rio Grande

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidade Federal do Rio Grande have published 14.4k papers, which have received a total of 208.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 576 papers in Aquatic Science, 658 papers in Oceanography, 753 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 166 papers in Research and Theory and 1k papers in Ecology on the topics of Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (588 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (374 papers), Marine and fisheries research (310 papers), Algal biology and biofuel production (287 papers), Marine and coastal ecosystems (227 papers), Crustacean biology and ecology (227 papers), Marine animal studies overview (223 papers) and Environmental Sustainability and Education (219 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Aquatic Science (13.7k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (16.6k citations), Oceanography (12.4k citations), Pollution (10.7k citations) and Ecology (18.9k citations). Authors at Universidade Federal do Rio Grande collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Spain and have published in prestigious journals including Aquaculture, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, The Science of The Total Environment, Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências and Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. Some of Universidade Federal do Rio Grande's most productive authors include Jorge Alberto Vieira Costa, Luiz Antônio de Almeida Pinto, Adalto Bianchini, Michele Greque de Morais, Wilson Wasielesky, Guilherme Luiz Dotto, José María Monserrat, Gilberto Fillmann, Paulo César Abreu and Eliana Badiale–Furlong.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact