Fondation Pour la Recherche Sur la Biodiversité
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Papers in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 44
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 52
- Top scholars
- Cyrille ViolleDavid MouillotPeter B. ReichJens KattgeBrian Joseph EnquistStephen W. PacalaMichel KulbickiValériano Parravicini
- Journals
- Environmental Evidence (14 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (9 papers)Ecology Letters (9 papers)Biodiversity and Conservation (7 papers)Ecology and Evolution (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Fondation Pour la Recherche Sur la Biodiversité
266 papers receiving 5.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 174
- Ecological Modeling 656
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.5k
- Ecology 2.5k
- Global and Planetary Change 1.4k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.1k
Countries citing scholars working at Fondation Pour la Recherche Sur la Biodiversité
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Fondation Pour la Recherche Sur la Biodiversité. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Fondation Pour la Recherche Sur la Biodiversité with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fondation Pour la Recherche Sur la Biodiversité more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Fondation Pour la Recherche Sur la Biodiversité
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Fondation Pour la Recherche Sur la Biodiversité at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Fondation Pour la Recherche Sur la Biodiversité at the time of their publication.
About Fondation Pour la Recherche Sur la Biodiversité
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Fondation Pour la Recherche Sur la Biodiversité have published 330 papers, which have received a total of 6.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 44 papers in Ecological Modeling, 76 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 140 papers in Ecology, 66 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 56 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics on the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (78 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (52 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (44 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (22 papers), Plant and animal studies (21 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (19 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (18 papers) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (15 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (656 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.5k citations), Ecology (2.5k citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.4k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.1k citations). Authors at Fondation Pour la Recherche Sur la Biodiversité collaborate with scholars in France, United Kingdom and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Environmental Evidence, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Ecology Letters, Biodiversity and Conservation and Ecology and Evolution. Some of Fondation Pour la Recherche Sur la Biodiversité's most productive authors include Cyrille Violle, David Mouillot, Peter B. Reich, Jens Kattge, Brian Joseph Enquist, Stephen W. Pacala, Michel Kulbicki, Valériano Parravicini, David R. Bellwood and Xavier Le Roux.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.