Ecosystèmes forestiers

7.0k citations
268 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Ecosystèmes forestiers

241 papers receiving 6.7k citations

Peers

Ecosystèmes forestiers
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 3.4k
  • Insect Science 2.5k
  • Global and Planetary Change 2.7k
  • Ecological Modeling 525
  • Ecology 2.1k
Replace Laboratoire Dynamique de la Biodiversité with:
Laboratoire Dynamique de la Biodiversité France
Service Public de Wallonie Belgium
Forstliche Versuchs- und Forschungsanstalt Baden-Württemberg Germany
Fondation Pour la Recherche Sur la Biodiversité France
Laboratoire de Génétique & Evolution des Populations Végétales France
Conservatoire botanique national méditerranéen France
Forêt Méditerranéenne France
Natural Resources Wales United Kingdom
info fauna Switzerland
Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology Netherlands
Ecosystèmes forestiers relative to Laboratoire Dynamique de la Biodiversité France Laboratoire Dynamique de la Biodiversité's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Laboratoire Dynamique de la Biodiversité · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Ecosystèmes forestiers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Ecosystèmes forestiers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Ecosystèmes forestiers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ecosystèmes forestiers more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Ecosystèmes forestiers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Ecosystèmes forestiers at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Ecosystèmes forestiers at the time of their publication.

About Ecosystèmes forestiers

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Ecosystèmes forestiers have published 268 papers, which have received a total of 7.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 103 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 87 papers in Insect Science, 105 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 16 papers in Ecological Modeling and 64 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics on the topics of Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (77 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (67 papers), Forest Management and Policy (56 papers), Forest ecology and management (48 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (32 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (28 papers), French Urban and Social Studies (22 papers) and Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (21 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (3.4k citations), Insect Science (2.5k citations), Global and Planetary Change (2.7k citations), Ecological Modeling (525 citations) and Ecology (2.1k citations). Authors at Ecosystèmes forestiers collaborate with scholars in France, Germany and Belgium and have published in prestigious journals including Forest Ecology and Management, Annals of Forest Science, Ecological Indicators, Biological Conservation and Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. Some of Ecosystèmes forestiers's most productive authors include Frédéric GOSSELIN, Philippe Balandier, Stéphane Barbier, Yoan Paillet, Christophe Bouget, Frédéric Archaux, Nathalie Korboulewsky, Thomas Pérot, Patrick Vallet and Aurore Lassauce.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact