Fundación Marques de Valdecilla

21.0k citations
772 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Fundación Marques de Valdecilla

645 papers receiving 17.4k citations

Peers

Fundación Marques de Valdecilla
Comparison fields: 5 of 213
  • Molecular Medicine 1.4k
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 304
  • Rheumatology 2.2k
  • Endocrinology 508
  • Transplantation 234
Replace Instituto Nacional de la Salud with:
Instituto Nacional de la Salud Spain
Hôpital Universitaire Dupuytren France
PhysioPathologie des Adaptations Nutritionnelles France
Centre Hospitalier Départemental Vendée France
Danone (France) France
Plymouth Hospital United Kingdom
Royal Cornwall Hospital Trust United Kingdom
Association pour la Recherche en Physiologie de l’Environnement France
Hospital Virgen del Camino Spain
MSD (Spain) Spain
Fundación Marques de Valdecilla relative to Instituto Nacional de la Salud Spain Instituto Nacional de la Salud's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Instituto Nacional de la Salud · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Fundación Marques de Valdecilla

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Fundación Marques de Valdecilla. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Fundación Marques de Valdecilla with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fundación Marques de Valdecilla more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Fundación Marques de Valdecilla

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Fundación Marques de Valdecilla at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Fundación Marques de Valdecilla at the time of their publication.

About Fundación Marques de Valdecilla

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Fundación Marques de Valdecilla have published 772 papers, which have received a total of 21.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 88 papers in Rheumatology, 15 papers in Transplantation, 25 papers in Molecular Medicine, 19 papers in Ecological Modeling and 59 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine on the topics of Vasculitis and related conditions (38 papers), Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (29 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (29 papers), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (29 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (29 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (25 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (25 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (19 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Molecular Medicine (1.4k citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (304 citations), Rheumatology (2.2k citations), Endocrinology (508 citations) and Transplantation (234 citations). Authors at Fundación Marques de Valdecilla collaborate with scholars in Spain, United States and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Arthritis Research & Therapy, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, The Journal of Rheumatology and Journal of Neurology. Some of Fundación Marques de Valdecilla's most productive authors include Miguel Ángel González-Gay, Javier Llorca, Juan G. Álvarez, Denny Sakkas, Carlos González‐Juanatey, Ricardo Blanco, Marcos López‐Hoyos, Antonio‐Román Muñoz, Luis Martı́nez-Martı́nez and Miguel Angel Ferrer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact