Federal Bureau of Investigation

37.5k citations
1.3k papers ·

Impact in

  • Genetics top 10%
    • Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Toxicology top 5%
    • Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis

Papers in

    • Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis 104
    • Forensic and Genetic Research 406

Federal Bureau of Investigation

1.2k papers receiving 37.4k citations

Peers

Federal Bureau of Investigation
Comparison fields: 5 of 238
  • Genetics 12.2k
  • Toxicology 2k
  • Archeology 2.5k
  • Safety Research 1.9k
  • Insect Science 1.3k
Replace Office of Chief Medical Examiner with:
Office of Chief Medical Examiner United States
College of Wooster United States
Hampshire College United States
Office of the Director United States
Bates College United States
Canadian Institutes of Health Research Canada
Campbell University United States
New England Research Institutes United States
Calvin University United States
University of North Carolina at Asheville United States
Federal Bureau of Investigation relative to Office of Chief Medical Examiner United States Office of Chief Medical Examiner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.9×
Office of Chief Medical Examiner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Federal Bureau of Investigation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Federal Bureau of Investigation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Federal Bureau of Investigation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federal Bureau of Investigation more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Federal Bureau of Investigation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Federal Bureau of Investigation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Federal Bureau of Investigation at the time of their publication.

About Federal Bureau of Investigation

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Federal Bureau of Investigation have published 1.3k papers, which have received a total of 37.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 104 papers in Toxicology, 418 papers in Genetics, 129 papers in Archeology, 97 papers in Safety Research and 65 papers in Analytical Chemistry on the topics of Forensic and Genetic Research (406 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (104 papers), Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (94 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (81 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (61 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (50 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (50 papers) and Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (47 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Genetics (12.2k citations), Toxicology (2k citations), Archeology (2.5k citations), Safety Research (1.9k citations) and Insect Science (1.3k citations). Authors at Federal Bureau of Investigation collaborate with scholars in United States, Spain and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Forensic Sciences, Forensic Science International, Forensic Science International Genetics, International Journal of Legal Medicine and Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Some of Federal Bureau of Investigation's most productive authors include Bruce Budowle, Ranajit Chakraborty, Douglas R. Hares, Bruce Budowle, John P. Jarvis, Ann Wolbert Burgess, Marc A. LeBeau, Angi M. Christensen, Mark R. Wilson and John E. Douglas.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact