Federal Bureau of Investigation
Impact in
- Genetics top 10%
- Forensic and Genetic Research
- Toxicology top 5%
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Papers in
- Toxicology 104
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis 104
- Genetics 418
- Forensic and Genetic Research 406
- Top scholars
- Bruce BudowleRanajit ChakrabortyDouglas R. HaresJohn P. JarvisAnn Wolbert BurgessMarc A. LeBeauAngi M. ChristensenMark R. Wilson
- Journals
- Journal of Forensic Sciences (333 papers)Forensic Science International (116 papers)Forensic Science International Genetics (43 papers)International Journal of Legal Medicine (33 papers)Journal of Analytical Toxicology (27 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSpainUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Federal Bureau of Investigation
1.2k papers receiving 37.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 238
- Genetics 12.2k
- Toxicology 2k
- Archeology 2.5k
- Safety Research 1.9k
- Insect Science 1.3k
Countries citing scholars working at Federal Bureau of Investigation
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Federal Bureau of Investigation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Federal Bureau of Investigation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federal Bureau of Investigation more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Federal Bureau of Investigation
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Federal Bureau of Investigation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Federal Bureau of Investigation at the time of their publication.
About Federal Bureau of Investigation
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Federal Bureau of Investigation have published 1.3k papers, which have received a total of 37.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 104 papers in Toxicology, 418 papers in Genetics, 129 papers in Archeology, 97 papers in Safety Research and 65 papers in Analytical Chemistry on the topics of Forensic and Genetic Research (406 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (104 papers), Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (94 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (81 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (61 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (50 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (50 papers) and Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (47 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Genetics (12.2k citations), Toxicology (2k citations), Archeology (2.5k citations), Safety Research (1.9k citations) and Insect Science (1.3k citations). Authors at Federal Bureau of Investigation collaborate with scholars in United States, Spain and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Forensic Sciences, Forensic Science International, Forensic Science International Genetics, International Journal of Legal Medicine and Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Some of Federal Bureau of Investigation's most productive authors include Bruce Budowle, Ranajit Chakraborty, Douglas R. Hares, Bruce Budowle, John P. Jarvis, Ann Wolbert Burgess, Marc A. LeBeau, Angi M. Christensen, Mark R. Wilson and John E. Douglas.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.