Economic and Social Research Council

776 papers receiving 33.5k citations

Peers

Economic and Social Research Council
Comparison fields: 5 of 232
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 4.4k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 4.0k
  • Public Administration 1.0k
  • General Health Professions 6.4k
  • Social Psychology 5.7k
Replace Henley College with:
Henley College United Kingdom
British Academy United Kingdom
ESCP Business School France
Loughborough College United Kingdom
Nyenrode Business University Netherlands
Netherlands Institute for Social Research Netherlands
RAND Europe United Kingdom
Amsterdam University College Netherlands
Regent's University London United Kingdom
Leeds Trinity University United Kingdom
Economic and Social Research Council relative to Henley College United Kingdom Henley College's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Henley College · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Economic and Social Research Council

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Economic and Social Research Council. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Economic and Social Research Council with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Economic and Social Research Council more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Economic and Social Research Council

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Economic and Social Research Council at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Economic and Social Research Council at the time of their publication.

About Economic and Social Research Council

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Economic and Social Research Council have published 918 papers, which have received a total of 38.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 43 papers in Public Administration, 12 papers in General Decision Sciences, 132 papers in General Health Professions, 59 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 89 papers in Social Psychology on the topics of Employment and Welfare Studies (57 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (33 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (28 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (28 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (22 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (22 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (21 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (20 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (4.4k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (4.0k citations), Public Administration (1.0k citations), General Health Professions (6.4k citations) and Social Psychology (5.7k citations). Authors at Economic and Social Research Council collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and France and have published in prestigious journals including British Journal of Clinical Psychology, Work & Stress, The Political Quarterly, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting and Journal of Organizational Behavior. Some of Economic and Social Research Council's most productive authors include Peter Warr, Michael West, Heledd Jenkins, Paul R. Jackson, Lorraine Whitmarsh, Brian Wynne, Guillaume Thierry, Simon Folkard, Natalia Yakovleva and Yan Jing Wu.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact