EduInnovation

6.1k citations
317 papers ·

Impact in

    • Immune cells in cancer
    • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
    • Immune Cell Function and Interaction

Papers in

EduInnovation

255 papers receiving 5.7k citations

Peers

EduInnovation
Comparison fields: 5 of 220
  • Immunology 630
  • Neurology 206
  • Dermatology 177
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 352
  • Biomaterials 259
Replace Canadian Society of Intestinal Research with:
Canadian Society of Intestinal Research Canada
Simpson University United States
Wisdom Health (United States) United States
College of San Mateo United States
ZRT Laboratory United States
SC Solutions (United States) United States
Brocade (United States) United States
Flex (United States) United States
Maxim Integrated (United States) United States
Imperial Metals (Canada) Canada
EduInnovation relative to Canadian Society of Intestinal Research Canada Canadian Society of Intestinal Research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.0×
Canadian Society of Intestinal Research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at EduInnovation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at EduInnovation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at EduInnovation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites EduInnovation more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at EduInnovation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with EduInnovation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with EduInnovation at the time of their publication.

About EduInnovation

In recent decades, authors affiliated with EduInnovation have published 317 papers, which have received a total of 6.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 17 papers in Dermatology, 2 papers in Family Practice, 10 papers in Media Technology, 2 papers in Complementary and Manual Therapy and 7 papers in Small Animals on the topics of Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (10 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (9 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (7 papers), Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications (7 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (6 papers), Advanced Neural Network Applications (6 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (6 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (5 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Immunology (630 citations), Neurology (206 citations), Dermatology (177 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (352 citations) and Biomaterials (259 citations). Authors at EduInnovation collaborate with scholars in United States, China and France and have published in prestigious journals including Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, Toxicology in Vitro, Cancer Research, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology and Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. Some of EduInnovation's most productive authors include Mark W. McElroy, Prabir K. Dutta, Sweta Shrestha, Suhas V. Patankar, Christoph Brunner, Gisela Kobelt, Jonas Lundkvist, Fabrizio Facchinetti, Robert Holtz and George L. Morris.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact