Environment Agency

109.2k citations
2.6k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Environment Agency

2.4k papers receiving 103.9k citations

Peers

Environment Agency
Comparison fields: 5 of 238
  • Water Science and Technology 19.9k
  • Pollution 16.8k
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 19.3k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 16.8k
  • Environmental Chemistry 12.6k
Replace Freshwater Biological Association with:
Freshwater Biological Association United Kingdom
James Hutton Institute United Kingdom
Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science United Kingdom
Plymouth Marine Laboratory United Kingdom
Flemish Institute for Technological Research Belgium
Environmental Protection Agency Ireland
Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer France
IHE Delft Institute for Water Education Netherlands
Scottish Association For Marine Science United Kingdom
Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency Netherlands
Environment Agency relative to Freshwater Biological Association United Kingdom Freshwater Biological Association's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
Freshwater Biological Association · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Environment Agency

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Environment Agency. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Environment Agency with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Environment Agency more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Environment Agency

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Environment Agency at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Environment Agency at the time of their publication.

About Environment Agency

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Environment Agency have published 2.6k papers, which have received a total of 109.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 540 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 487 papers in Water Science and Technology, 317 papers in Environmental Chemistry, 735 papers in Ecology and 604 papers in Global and Planetary Change on the topics of Fish Ecology and Management Studies (493 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (336 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (255 papers), Flood Risk Assessment and Management (223 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (193 papers), Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (149 papers), Marine and fisheries research (144 papers) and Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (135 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Water Science and Technology (19.9k citations), Pollution (16.8k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (19.3k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (16.8k citations) and Environmental Chemistry (12.6k citations). Authors at Environment Agency collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, Germany and United States and have published in prestigious journals including The Science of The Total Environment, Water and Environment Journal, Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, Hydrobiologia and Journal of Fish Biology. Some of Environment Agency's most productive authors include Robert Leonard Wilby, Geoff C. Brighty, John P. Sumpter, Charles R. Tyler, Susan Jobling, Richard Owen, Wolfgang Babisch, Jonathan W. N. Smith, Monique Nolan and Stuart A. Kirk.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact