Max Planck Institute for Ornithology
Impact in
- Developmental Biology top 0.2%
- Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
-
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
Papers in
-
- Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior 377
-
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction 1.1k
- Bat Biology and Ecology Studies 175
- Top scholars
- Holger SchielzethShinichi NakagawaEberhard GwinnerBart KempenaersMartin C. WikelskiWolfgang ForstmeierPeter R. BertholdNiels Jeroen Dingemanse
- Journals
- Animal Behaviour (127 papers)Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (107 papers)PLoS ONE (106 papers)Behavioral Ecology (88 papers)Die Naturwissenschaften (82 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Max Planck Institute for Ornithology
3.9k papers receiving 161.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 235
- Developmental Biology 11.9k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 48.8k
- Ecology 49.2k
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 6.6k
- Behavioral Neuroscience 2.4k
Countries citing scholars working at Max Planck Institute for Ornithology
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Max Planck Institute for Ornithology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Max Planck Institute for Ornithology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Planck Institute for Ornithology more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Max Planck Institute for Ornithology
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Max Planck Institute for Ornithology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Max Planck Institute for Ornithology at the time of their publication.
About Max Planck Institute for Ornithology
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Max Planck Institute for Ornithology have published 4k papers, which have received a total of 161.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 377 papers in Developmental Biology, 1.3k papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 1.3k papers in Ecology, 214 papers in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and 47 papers in Behavioral Neuroscience on the topics of Animal Behavior and Reproduction (1.1k papers), Avian ecology and behavior (1k papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (377 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (223 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (211 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (175 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (160 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (141 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Developmental Biology (11.9k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (48.8k citations), Ecology (49.2k citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (6.6k citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (2.4k citations). Authors at Max Planck Institute for Ornithology collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Animal Behaviour, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, PLoS ONE, Behavioral Ecology and Die Naturwissenschaften. Some of Max Planck Institute for Ornithology's most productive authors include Holger Schielzeth, Shinichi Nakagawa, Eberhard Gwinner, Bart Kempenaers, Martin C. Wikelski, Wolfgang Forstmeier, Peter R. Berthold, Niels Jeroen Dingemanse, Irenäus Eibl‐Eibesfeldt and Wolfgang Goymann.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.